Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6222V

Intel

Xeon E5-2679 v4

20 Cores40 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2016

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6222V

20 Cores40 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +81.8% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 28 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (24,131 vs 24,254).
  • Launch MSRP is still $2,702 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6222V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.

Xeon Gold 6222V

2019

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2679 v4 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (28 MB vs 50 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6222V better than Xeon E5-2679 v4?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon E5-2679 v4 is ahead with a 14.1% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6222V pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2679 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 81.8% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 28 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6222V is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6222V is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2679 v4 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Gold 6222V is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,702 MSRP, and it gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-2679 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 14.1% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2679 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6222V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 40 threads instead of 20/40. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon E5-2679 v4Xeon Gold 6222V
1080p
low182 FPS186 FPS
medium160 FPS151 FPS
high126 FPS123 FPS
ultra100 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low151 FPS146 FPS
medium127 FPS115 FPS
high96 FPS92 FPS
ultra78 FPS72 FPS
4K
low70 FPS68 FPS
medium62 FPS57 FPS
high48 FPS45 FPS
ultra39 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon E5-2679 v4Xeon Gold 6222V
1080p
low364 FPS189 FPS
medium331 FPS169 FPS
high279 FPS146 FPS
ultra224 FPS119 FPS
1440p
low313 FPS163 FPS
medium284 FPS149 FPS
high242 FPS130 FPS
ultra188 FPS105 FPS
4K
low195 FPS107 FPS
medium178 FPS98 FPS
high153 FPS87 FPS
ultra120 FPS69 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon E5-2679 v4Xeon Gold 6222V
1080p
low603 FPS606 FPS
medium603 FPS606 FPS
high603 FPS606 FPS
ultra603 FPS606 FPS
1440p
low603 FPS606 FPS
medium590 FPS605 FPS
high559 FPS573 FPS
ultra505 FPS506 FPS
4K
low447 FPS455 FPS
medium363 FPS357 FPS
high328 FPS318 FPS
ultra274 FPS259 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon E5-2679 v4Xeon Gold 6222V
1080p
low603 FPS606 FPS
medium603 FPS606 FPS
high603 FPS606 FPS
ultra585 FPS558 FPS
1440p
low603 FPS606 FPS
medium603 FPS584 FPS
high545 FPS502 FPS
ultra462 FPS430 FPS
4K
low527 FPS461 FPS
medium472 FPS412 FPS
high418 FPS367 FPS
ultra359 FPS318 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon Gold 6222V

Intel

Xeon E5-2679 v4

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6222V

The Xeon Gold 6222V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,254 points. Launch price was $1,600.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon Gold 6222V share an identical 20-core/40-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6222V — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6222V (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2679 v4 scores 24,131 against the Xeon Gold 6222V's 24,254 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6222V. L3 cache: 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6222V.

FeatureXeon E5-2679 v4Xeon Gold 6222V
Cores / Threads
20 / 40
20 / 40
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+39%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
50 MB+82%
27.5 MB
L2 Cache
5 MB
20 MB+300%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
24,131
24,254
Geekbench 6 Single
1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2679 v4Xeon Gold 6222V
Socket
LGA2011-3
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
1536 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6222V).

FeatureXeon E5-2679 v4Xeon Gold 6222V
Integrated GPU
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes