
Xeon E5-2679 v4
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6222V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E5-2679 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 28 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,131 vs 24,254).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,702 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6222V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.
Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2679 v4 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (28 MB vs 50 MB).
Xeon E5-2679 v4
2016Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 28 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,131 vs 24,254).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,702 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6222V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2679 v4 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (28 MB vs 50 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6222V better than Xeon E5-2679 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2679 v4 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2679 v4 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 364 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E5-2679 v4 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 603 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 603 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 603 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 603 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 559 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E5-2679 v4 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 603 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 603 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 585 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 603 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 603 FPS | 584 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon Gold 6222V

Xeon E5-2679 v4
Xeon E5-2679 v4
The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6222V
Xeon Gold 6222V
The Xeon Gold 6222V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,254 points. Launch price was $1,600.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E5-2679 v4 and Xeon Gold 6222V share an identical 20-core/40-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6222V — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6222V (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2679 v4 scores 24,131 against the Xeon Gold 6222V's 24,254 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6222V. L3 cache: 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6222V.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2679 v4 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40 | 20 / 40 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+39% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 50 MB+82% | 27.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 5 MB | 20 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,131 | 24,254 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2679 v4 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011-3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6222V).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2679 v4 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












