
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6137
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 205W, a 177W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6137, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 19,469).
- ❌632.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
2025Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 205W, a 177W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6137, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 19,469).
- ❌632.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 better than Xeon Gold 6137?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 191 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 403 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 340 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 337 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 and Xeon Gold 6137


Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,469 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137
The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6137 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6137 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is built on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 19,469 against the Xeon Gold 6137's 19,365 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 vs 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+17% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.9 GHz+95% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 25 MB+213% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Krackan Point (2025) | — |
| PassMark | 19,469 | 19,365 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6137 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












