
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6137
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+12.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6137, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6137 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅+12.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6137, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6137 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon Gold 6137?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 191 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon Gold 6137


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137
The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6137 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6137 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X is built on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon Gold 6137's 19,365 — a 12% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+12% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+28% | 25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | — |
| PassMark | 21,845+13% | 19,365 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6137 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6137). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












