PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Gold 5416S

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($1,445 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5416S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 35,515).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCLGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5416S moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Gold 5416S

2023

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($1,445 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA3647 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5416S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 35,515).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCLGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5416S moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5416S better than Xeon Gold 6130H?

Yes. Xeon Gold 5416S is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 35.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5416S is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 35.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5416S is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5416S is the smarter buy today. Xeon Gold 5416S is $449 cheaper on MSRP at $1,445 MSRP versus $1,894 MSRP, and it gives you a 35.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 31.4% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 18.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5416S is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA3647, 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon Gold 5416S Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6130H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	186 FPS	182 FPS
medium	153 FPS	146 FPS
high	128 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	146 FPS	144 FPS
medium	115 FPS	114 FPS
high	93 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	67 FPS
medium	57 FPS	56 FPS
high	45 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	35 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 5416S Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	244 FPS	211 FPS
medium	214 FPS	186 FPS
high	179 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	151 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	206 FPS	182 FPS
medium	187 FPS	165 FPS
high	160 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	118 FPS
medium	122 FPS	107 FPS
high	111 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	81 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 5416S Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	888 FPS	697 FPS
medium	888 FPS	559 FPS
high	888 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	835 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	855 FPS	558 FPS
medium	755 FPS	453 FPS
high	702 FPS	411 FPS
ultra	628 FPS	355 FPS
4K
low	546 FPS	405 FPS
medium	447 FPS	315 FPS
high	388 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	317 FPS	225 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 5416S Open Xeon Gold 6130H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	888 FPS	848 FPS
medium	805 FPS	771 FPS
high	699 FPS	666 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	581 FPS
1440p
low	711 FPS	684 FPS
medium	621 FPS	600 FPS
high	536 FPS	516 FPS
ultra	461 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	494 FPS	471 FPS
medium	441 FPS	423 FPS
high	395 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	338 FPS	327 FPS

Open Xeon Gold 5416S Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 6130H

Xeon Gold 5416S

The Xeon Gold 5416S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 35,515 points. Launch price was $944.

Xeon Gold 6130H

The Xeon Gold 6130H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 35,440 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 6130H share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130H — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5416S (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5416S is built on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5416S scores 35,515 against the Xeon Gold 6130H's 35,440 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 5416S. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon Gold 5416S vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130H.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6130H
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	4 GHz+8%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	30 MB+36%	22 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	35,515	35,440

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 5416S uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6130H uses FCLGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4400 on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6130H — the Xeon Gold 5416S supports 49.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5416S supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 768 — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6130H). PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6130H) — the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 5416S) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6130H).

Feature	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6130H
Socket	LGA4677	FCLGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	4400+65%	2666
Max RAM Capacity	4096+433%	768
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	80+67%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5416S rivals EPYC 8124P; Xeon Gold 6130H rivals EPYC 7401.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5416S	Xeon Gold 6130H
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon Gold 5416S launched at $1445 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6130H debuted at $1894. On MSRP ($1445 vs $1894), the Xeon Gold 5416S is $449 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5416S delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 18.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6130H — making the Xeon Gold 5416S the 27.1% better value option.