
Xeon Gold 6122
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2175
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6122
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 140W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2175 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon W-2175
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,507 vs 23,781).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,947 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6122 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌16.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 120W.
Xeon Gold 6122
2018Xeon W-2175
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 140W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2175 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,507 vs 23,781).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,947 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6122 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌16.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6122 better than Xeon W-2175?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 178 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 595 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 577 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 513 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 557 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 410 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6122 and Xeon W-2175

Xeon Gold 6122
Xeon Gold 6122
The Xeon Gold 6122 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-2175
Xeon W-2175
The Xeon W-2175 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,507 points. Launch price was $1,947.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6122 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-2175 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon Gold 6122 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6122 versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2175 — a 15% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2175 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon W-2175 is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6122 scores 23,781 against the Xeon W-2175's 23,507 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6122. L3 cache: 28 MB on the Xeon Gold 6122 vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2175.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+43% | 14 / 28 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 28 MB+45% | 19.25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 23,781+1% | 23,507 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6122 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2175 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












