
Xeon Gold 6122
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6122
2018Why buy it
- ✅+75% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1390 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,781 vs 23,902).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
Xeon W-1390
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6122 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6122
2018Xeon W-1390
2021Why buy it
- ✅+75% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1390 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,781 vs 23,902).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6122 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1390 better than Xeon Gold 6122?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 362 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 276 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 595 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 577 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 513 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6122 and Xeon W-1390

Xeon Gold 6122
Xeon Gold 6122
The Xeon Gold 6122 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-1390
Xeon W-1390
The Xeon W-1390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,902 points. Launch price was $494.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6122 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-1390 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6122 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6122 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1390 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon W-1390 is built on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6122 scores 23,781 against the Xeon W-1390's 23,902 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-1390. L3 cache: 28 MB on the Xeon Gold 6122 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+150% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | 28 MB+75% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 23,781 | 23,902 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6122 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1390 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6122 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












