
Core i9-7920X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6122
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-7920X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 23,781).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6122, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6122 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌16.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 120W.
Xeon Gold 6122
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+69.7% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 140W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-7920X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i9-7920X
2017Xeon Gold 6122
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+69.7% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 140W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 23,781).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6122, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6122 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌16.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-7920X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6122 better than Core i9-7920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Xeon Gold 6122 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Xeon Gold 6122 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Xeon Gold 6122 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 390 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 225 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Xeon Gold 6122 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 577 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 502 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 531 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 325 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7920X and Xeon Gold 6122

Core i9-7920X
Core i9-7920X
The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Xeon Gold 6122
Xeon Gold 6122
The Xeon Gold 6122 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6122 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6122 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6122 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-7920X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i9-7920X is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-7920X scores 23,508 against the Xeon Gold 6122's 23,781 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6122. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X vs 28 MB on the Xeon Gold 6122.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Xeon Gold 6122 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 20 / 40+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+61% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB (total) | 28 MB+70% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | — |
| PassMark | 23,508 | 23,781+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6122 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Xeon Gold 6122 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












