
Core i9-7920X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-7920X
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 23,781).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-7920X
2017Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 23,781).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H better than Core i9-7920X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 390 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 591 FPS |
| ultra | 502 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 531 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7920X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Core i9-7920X
Core i9-7920X
The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-7920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7920X scores 23,508 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H's 23,781 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB (total)+3% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 23,508 | 23,781+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











