
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5520+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $334 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 205W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Xeon Gold 5520+ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5520+, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (61,227 vs 61,578).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌272.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $334 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 205W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Xeon Gold 5520+ needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5520+, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (61,227 vs 61,578).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌272.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX3D better than Xeon Gold 5520+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 698 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 601 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 98 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 851 FPS | 875 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 792 FPS |
| high | 627 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 658 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 749 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 674 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1080 FPS | 935 FPS |
| medium | 976 FPS | 842 FPS |
| high | 854 FPS | 728 FPS |
| ultra | 768 FPS | 632 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 853 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 753 FPS | 674 FPS |
| high | 660 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and Xeon Gold 5520+


Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,578 points. Launch price was $700.

Xeon Gold 5520+
Xeon Gold 5520+
The Xeon Gold 5520+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,227 points. Launch price was $1,640.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5520+ offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 5520+ has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5520+ — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D scores 61,578 against the Xeon Gold 5520+'s 61,227 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5520+.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 28 / 56+75% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+35% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+14% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+144% | 52.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 61,578 | 61,227 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,600 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Gold 5520+ — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5520+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 96 — 190.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5520+). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5520+) — the Xeon Gold 5520+ offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5520+).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 | 4096 GB+4473924167% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5520+). The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5520+ targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9955HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 185H; Xeon Gold 5520+ rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D launched at $749 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5520+ debuted at $1083. On MSRP ($749 vs $1083), the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is $334 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D delivers 82.2 pts/$ vs 56.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5520+ — making the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D the 37% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $749-31% | $1083 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.2+45% | 56.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












