EPYC 7642 vs Xeon Gold 5512U

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7642

48 Cores96 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Gold 5512U

28 Cores56 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 7642

48 / 96

59,333

0.0%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Gold 5512U

28 / 56

60,367

+1.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7642

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 60,367).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).
❌21.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 185W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5512U moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Gold 5512U

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $3,545 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Delivers 295.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Draws 185W instead of 225W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7642 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

EPYC 7642

2019

Xeon Gold 5512U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $3,545 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Delivers 295.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $4,775 MSRP).
✅Draws 185W instead of 225W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (59,333 vs 60,367).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($4,775 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).
❌21.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 185W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5512U moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7642 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5512U better than EPYC 7642?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 7642 is ahead with a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5512U pulls ahead with 1.7% better PassMark. EPYC 7642 also has the bigger cache pool with 387.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 53 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5512U is the better fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5512U is the smarter buy today. Xeon Gold 5512U is $3,545 cheaper on MSRP at $1,230 MSRP versus $4,775 MSRP, and it gives you 1.7% better PassMark. The trade-off is that EPYC 7642 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 295.0% better value on MSRP (49.1 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5512U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4, more multi-core headroom with 28 cores / 56 threads instead of 48/96, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7642 Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 5512U Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7642	Xeon Gold 5512U
1080p
low	192 FPS	184 FPS
medium	172 FPS	162 FPS
high	138 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	157 FPS	153 FPS
medium	132 FPS	129 FPS
high	101 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	69 FPS
medium	65 FPS	62 FPS
high	50 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 7642 Open Xeon Gold 5512U

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7642	Xeon Gold 5512U
1080p
low	427 FPS	270 FPS
medium	381 FPS	241 FPS
high	312 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	166 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	227 FPS
medium	321 FPS	205 FPS
high	271 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	210 FPS	140 FPS
4K
low	216 FPS	141 FPS
medium	202 FPS	130 FPS
high	171 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	98 FPS

Open EPYC 7642 Open Xeon Gold 5512U

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7642	Xeon Gold 5512U
1080p
low	629 FPS	777 FPS
medium	536 FPS	691 FPS
high	486 FPS	657 FPS
ultra	415 FPS	581 FPS
1440p
low	524 FPS	672 FPS
medium	446 FPS	594 FPS
high	394 FPS	562 FPS
ultra	338 FPS	503 FPS
4K
low	389 FPS	453 FPS
medium	312 FPS	370 FPS
high	274 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	224 FPS	279 FPS

Open EPYC 7642 Open Xeon Gold 5512U

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7642	Xeon Gold 5512U
1080p
low	909 FPS	940 FPS
medium	829 FPS	841 FPS
high	715 FPS	726 FPS
ultra	619 FPS	622 FPS
1440p
low	714 FPS	762 FPS
medium	624 FPS	666 FPS
high	535 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	455 FPS	484 FPS
4K
low	505 FPS	550 FPS
medium	455 FPS	493 FPS
high	401 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	346 FPS	372 FPS

Open EPYC 7642 Open Xeon Gold 5512U

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7642 and Xeon Gold 5512U

EPYC 7642

The EPYC 7642 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 59,333 points. Launch price was $4,775.

Xeon Gold 5512U

The Xeon Gold 5512U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,367 points. Launch price was $1,230.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7642 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5512U offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7642 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7642 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5512U — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5512U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 7642 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7642 scores 59,333 against the Xeon Gold 5512U's 60,367 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5512U. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7642 vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5512U.

Feature	EPYC 7642	Xeon Gold 5512U
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+71%	28 / 56
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+388%	52.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	59,333	60,367+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7642 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7642 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 5512U — the Xeon Gold 5512U supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7642) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5512U) — the EPYC 7642 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7642) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5512U).

Feature	EPYC 7642	Xeon Gold 5512U
Socket	TR4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 5512U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7642 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Gold 5512U rivals EPYC 9354.

Feature	EPYC 7642	Xeon Gold 5512U
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7642 launched at $4775 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5512U debuted at $1230. On MSRP ($4775 vs $1230), the Xeon Gold 5512U is $3545 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7642 delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 49.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5512U — making the Xeon Gold 5512U the 119.2% better value option.