
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5315Y, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5315Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,477 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5315Y, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5315Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,477 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon Gold 5315Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 108 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon Gold 5315Y


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Xeon Gold 5315Y
The Xeon Gold 5315Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,477 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5315Y offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 5315Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5315Y — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon Gold 5315Y's 20,477 — a 6.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5315Y.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+28% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,845+7% | 20,477 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5315Y). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












