Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Xeon Gold 5218T

Intel

Xeon E5-2697A v4

16 Cores32 Thrd145 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 5218T

16 Cores32 Thrd105 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon E5-2697A v4

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +81.8% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 22 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($2,891 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
  • 38.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 105W.

Xeon Gold 5218T

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,319 less on MSRP ($1,572 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
  • Delivers 82.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($1,572 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
  • Draws 105W instead of 145W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697A v4 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 21,621).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 40 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2697A v4 better than Xeon Gold 5218T?
Yes. Xeon E5-2697A v4 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 13.0% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2697A v4 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 13.0% more average FPS across 36 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2697A v4 is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 81.8% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 22 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-2697A v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 5218T makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon E5-2697A v4 is 83.9% more expensive on MSRP at $2,891 MSRP versus $1,572 MSRP, and it gives you a 13.0% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 5218T is also 82.3% better value on MSRP (13.6 vs 7.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5218T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon E5-2697A v4Xeon Gold 5218T
1080p
low182 FPS185 FPS
medium158 FPS148 FPS
high126 FPS119 FPS
ultra101 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low152 FPS147 FPS
medium128 FPS116 FPS
high99 FPS92 FPS
ultra80 FPS72 FPS
4K
low69 FPS68 FPS
medium62 FPS57 FPS
high48 FPS45 FPS
ultra39 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon E5-2697A v4Xeon Gold 5218T
1080p
low364 FPS212 FPS
medium330 FPS186 FPS
high279 FPS160 FPS
ultra224 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low313 FPS183 FPS
medium284 FPS165 FPS
high242 FPS142 FPS
ultra188 FPS119 FPS
4K
low195 FPS118 FPS
medium178 FPS107 FPS
high153 FPS98 FPS
ultra120 FPS81 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon E5-2697A v4Xeon Gold 5218T
1080p
low541 FPS536 FPS
medium541 FPS536 FPS
high541 FPS495 FPS
ultra541 FPS429 FPS
1440p
low541 FPS536 FPS
medium541 FPS449 FPS
high541 FPS408 FPS
ultra532 FPS354 FPS
4K
low466 FPS399 FPS
medium379 FPS314 FPS
high345 FPS281 FPS
ultra289 FPS226 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon E5-2697A v4Xeon Gold 5218T
1080p
low541 FPS536 FPS
medium541 FPS536 FPS
high541 FPS536 FPS
ultra541 FPS536 FPS
1440p
low541 FPS536 FPS
medium541 FPS536 FPS
high541 FPS536 FPS
ultra497 FPS468 FPS
4K
low541 FPS500 FPS
medium515 FPS449 FPS
high455 FPS400 FPS
ultra381 FPS345 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 5218T

Intel

Xeon E5-2697A v4

The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,621 points. Launch price was $2,891.

Intel

Xeon Gold 5218T

The Xeon Gold 5218T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,433 points. Launch price was $1,561.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 5218T share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218T — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5218T (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 scores 21,621 against the Xeon Gold 5218T's 21,433 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2697A v4. L3 cache: 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218T.

FeatureXeon E5-2697A v4Xeon Gold 5218T
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+24%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
40 MB+82%
22 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
16 MB+300%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
21,621
21,433
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2697A v4Xeon Gold 5218T
Socket
LGA2011
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-2697A v4 launched at $2891 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5218T debuted at $1572. On MSRP ($2891 vs $1572), the Xeon Gold 5218T is $1319 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2697A v4 delivers 7.5 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5218T — making the Xeon Gold 5218T the 58.3% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2697A v4Xeon Gold 5218T
MSRP
$2891
$1572-46%
Performance per Dollar
7.5
13.6+81%
Release Date
2016
2019