
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2697A v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,592 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 876.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697A v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,621 vs 21,845).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($2,891 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,592 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 876.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697A v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,621 vs 21,845).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($2,891 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Xeon E5-2697A v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 541 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 532 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 541 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 381 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon E5-2697A v4


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2697A v4
Xeon E5-2697A v4
The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,621 points. Launch price was $2,891.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon E5-2697A v4's 21,621 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2697A v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+28% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+42% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 40 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 21,845+1% | 21,621 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2697A v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 debuted at $2891. On MSRP ($299 vs $2891), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $2592 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2697A v4 — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 162.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon E5-2697A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-90% | $2891 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+875% | 7.5 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












