
Xeon Gold 5215
Popular choices:

Xeon W-11865MLE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5215
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11865MLE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,757 vs 15,917).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌240% higher power demand at 85W vs 25W.
Xeon W-11865MLE
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+74.5% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 14 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 85W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $467 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5215 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5215
2019Xeon W-11865MLE
2021Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+74.5% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 14 MB).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 85W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11865MLE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,757 vs 15,917).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌240% higher power demand at 85W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $467 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5215 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-11865MLE better than Xeon Gold 5215?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5215 | Xeon W-11865MLE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5215 | Xeon W-11865MLE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 296 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5215 | Xeon W-11865MLE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 331 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 224 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5215 | Xeon W-11865MLE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 363 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5215 and Xeon W-11865MLE

Xeon Gold 5215
Xeon Gold 5215
The Xeon Gold 5215 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 15,757 points. Launch price was $1,221.

Xeon W-11865MLE
Xeon W-11865MLE
The Xeon W-11865MLE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 August 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,917 points. Launch price was $467.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5215 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-11865MLE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 5215 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5215 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-11865MLE — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11865MLE (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5215 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-11865MLE uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5215 scores 15,757 against the Xeon W-11865MLE's 15,917 — a 1% lead for the Xeon W-11865MLE. L3 cache: 13.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5215 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11865MLE.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5215 | Xeon W-11865MLE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+32% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+67% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 13.75 MB | 24 MB (total)+75% |
| L2 Cache | 10 MB+700% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 15,757 | 15,917+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5215 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11865MLE uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5215 | Xeon W-11865MLE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












