
Ryzen Embedded V2718
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5215
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Embedded V2718
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Xeon Gold 5215 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 14 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5215, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5215 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5215
2019Why buy it
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (14 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,757 vs 15,831).
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Embedded V2718 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen Embedded V2718
2020Xeon Gold 5215
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Xeon Gold 5215 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (14 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 14 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5215, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5215 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,757 vs 15,831).
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Embedded V2718 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded V2718 better than Xeon Gold 5215?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V2718 | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V2718 | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 96 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V2718 | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V2718 | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 343 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded V2718 and Xeon Gold 5215


Ryzen Embedded V2718
Ryzen Embedded V2718
The Ryzen Embedded V2718 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,831 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 5215
Xeon Gold 5215
The Xeon Gold 5215 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 15,757 points. Launch price was $1,221.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Embedded V2718 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5215 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Gold 5215 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2718 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5215 — a 19.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V2718 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5215 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V2718 scores 15,831 against the Xeon Gold 5215's 15,757 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2718. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5215.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2718 | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.15 GHz+22% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.5 GHz+47% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 13.75 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 10 MB+1900% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 15,831 | 15,757 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 654 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,124 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,551 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5215 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2718 | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4 3200 MHz | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Ryzen Embedded V2718) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5215). The Ryzen Embedded V2718 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 7), while the Xeon Gold 5215 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Embedded V2718 targets Embedded.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V2718 | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












