
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5215
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,570 vs 15,757).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5215, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $399 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5215 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5215
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 95W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
2017Xeon Gold 5215
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 95W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,570 vs 15,757).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5215, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $399 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5215 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5215 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 96 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 394 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 364 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 343 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X and Xeon Gold 5215


Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,570 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 5215
Xeon Gold 5215
The Xeon Gold 5215 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 15,757 points. Launch price was $1,221.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5215 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Gold 5215 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5215 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5215 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X scores 15,570 against the Xeon Gold 5215's 15,757 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 5215. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5215.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+36% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+16% | 13.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 10 MB+1900% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 15,570 | 15,757+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5215 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5215). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X | Xeon Gold 5215 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












