EPYC 9555P vs Xeon 6960P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9555P

64 Cores128 Thrd360 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon 6960P

72 Cores144 Thrd500 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9555P

64 / 128

135,441

+3.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

Xeon 6960P

72 / 144

130,659

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9555P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,642 less on MSRP ($7,983 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
✅Draws 360W instead of 500W, a 140W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,406 vs 60,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 432 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon 6960P

2024

Why buy it

✅+104% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+68.8% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 256 MB).
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($9,625 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
❌38.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 360W.

EPYC 9555P

2024

Xeon 6960P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,642 less on MSRP ($7,983 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
✅Draws 360W instead of 500W, a 140W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+104% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+68.8% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 256 MB).
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,406 vs 60,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 432 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9555P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($9,625 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
❌38.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 360W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9555P better than Xeon 6960P?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 9555P is ahead with a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6960P pulls ahead with 104% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon 6960P also has the bigger cache pool with 68.8% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6960P is the better fit. You are getting 104% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 72 cores and 144 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 68.8% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9555P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9555P is $1,642 cheaper on MSRP at $7,983 MSRP versus $9,625 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon 6960P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 104% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 25.0% better value on MSRP (17.0 vs 13.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6960P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 68.8% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 256 MB), more multi-core headroom with 72 cores / 144 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9555P Benchmark Check

Xeon 6960P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9555P	Xeon 6960P
1080p
low	171 FPS	196 FPS
medium	142 FPS	159 FPS
high	122 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	159 FPS
medium	121 FPS	125 FPS
high	99 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	73 FPS
medium	73 FPS	60 FPS
high	57 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 9555P Open Xeon 6960P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9555P	Xeon 6960P
1080p
low	655 FPS	524 FPS
medium	566 FPS	450 FPS
high	459 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	397 FPS	293 FPS
1440p
low	546 FPS	430 FPS
medium	483 FPS	380 FPS
high	404 FPS	311 FPS
ultra	328 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	331 FPS	266 FPS
medium	295 FPS	239 FPS
high	268 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	236 FPS	174 FPS

Open EPYC 9555P Open Xeon 6960P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9555P	Xeon 6960P
1080p
low	747 FPS	985 FPS
medium	634 FPS	874 FPS
high	590 FPS	826 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	734 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	788 FPS
medium	474 FPS	689 FPS
high	434 FPS	651 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	579 FPS
4K
low	405 FPS	505 FPS
medium	326 FPS	397 FPS
high	288 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	288 FPS

Open EPYC 9555P Open Xeon 6960P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9555P	Xeon 6960P
1080p
low	1005 FPS	985 FPS
medium	902 FPS	891 FPS
high	778 FPS	768 FPS
ultra	702 FPS	658 FPS
1440p
low	809 FPS	764 FPS
medium	704 FPS	667 FPS
high	603 FPS	571 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	486 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	549 FPS
medium	510 FPS	489 FPS
high	447 FPS	430 FPS
ultra	392 FPS	369 FPS

Open EPYC 9555P Open Xeon 6960P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555P and Xeon 6960P

EPYC 9555P

The EPYC 9555P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,441 points. Launch price was $7,983.

Xeon 6960P

The Xeon 6960P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2024-09-24. It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 432 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA7529. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 130,659 points. Launch price was $9,625.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9555P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6960P offers 72 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6960P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555P versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6960P — a 12% clock advantage for the EPYC 9555P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9555P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6960P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555P scores 135,441 against the Xeon 6960P's 130,659 — a 3.6% lead for the EPYC 9555P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,815 vs 2,100, a 29.1% lead for the EPYC 9555P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,406 vs 60,000 (68.4% advantage for the Xeon 6960P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555P vs 432 MB (total) on the Xeon 6960P.

Feature	EPYC 9555P	Xeon 6960P
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	72 / 144+13%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+13%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+19%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	432 MB (total)+69%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	135,441+4%	130,659
Geekbench 6 Single	2,815+34%	2,100
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,406	60,000+104%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9555P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6960P uses LGA7529 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Xeon 6960P supports up to 3072 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9555P) vs 96 (Xeon 6960P) — the EPYC 9555P offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555P) and Intel 600 Series (Xeon 6960P).

Feature	EPYC 9555P	Xeon 6960P
Socket	SP5	LGA7529
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+100%	3072 GB
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+33%	96

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9555P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6960P). Primary use case: EPYC 9555P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Xeon 6960P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555P rivals Xeon 6979P; Xeon 6960P rivals EPYC 9654.

Feature	EPYC 9555P	Xeon 6960P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9555P launched at $7983 MSRP, while the Xeon 6960P debuted at $9625. On MSRP ($7983 vs $9625), the EPYC 9555P is $1642 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555P delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6960P — making the EPYC 9555P the 22.2% better value option.