
EPYC 7763
Popular choices:

Xeon 6780E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7763
2021Why buy it
- ✅+137% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 108 MB).
- ✅Costs $3,460 less on MSRP ($7,890 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 330W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (84,440 vs 86,734).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6780E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6780E
2024Why buy it
- ✅+2.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (108 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
- ❌17.9% higher power demand at 330W vs 280W.
EPYC 7763
2021Xeon 6780E
2024Why buy it
- ✅+137% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 108 MB).
- ✅Costs $3,460 less on MSRP ($7,890 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 330W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+2.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (84,440 vs 86,734).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6780E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (108 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
- ❌17.9% higher power demand at 330W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7763 better than Xeon 6780E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7763 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7763 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 418 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 344 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7763 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 836 FPS | 934 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 831 FPS |
| high | 649 FPS | 779 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7763 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 975 FPS | 897 FPS |
| medium | 885 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 761 FPS | 691 FPS |
| ultra | 655 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 648 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 554 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 476 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 531 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7763 and Xeon 6780E

EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763
The EPYC 7763 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 84,440 points. Launch price was $7,890.

Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7763 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6780E offers 144 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7763 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E — a 15.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 7763 (base: 2.45 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7763 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon 6780E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7763 scores 84,440 against the Xeon 6780E's 86,734 — a 2.7% lead for the Xeon 6780E. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7763 vs 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 144 / 144+125% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.45 GHz+11% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+137% | 108 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+700% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 84,440 | 86,734+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7763 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6780E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7763 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E — the EPYC 7763 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7763 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7763) vs 88 (Xeon 6780E) — the EPYC 7763 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4 TB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7763) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E). Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute. Direct competitor: EPYC 7763 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | — | Cloud Native Compute |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7763 launched at $7890 MSRP, while the Xeon 6780E debuted at $11350. On MSRP ($7890 vs $11350), the EPYC 7763 is $3460 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7763 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6780E — making the EPYC 7763 the 33.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7890-30% | $11350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7+41% | 7.6 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













