
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6747P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,998 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 177.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.4 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅4.5% more PCIe lanes (92 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,244 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
Xeon 6747P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+53.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 43.4 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
2025Xeon 6747P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,998 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 177.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.4 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅4.5% more PCIe lanes (92 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+53.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,244 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 43.4 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9970X better than Xeon 6747P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 818 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 697 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 542 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 674 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 891 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 649 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 1034 FPS |
| medium | 1002 FPS | 916 FPS |
| high | 879 FPS | 789 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 670 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 768 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 674 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 587 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 504 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 403 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 9970X and Xeon 6747P


Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 108,377 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Xeon 6747P
Xeon 6747P
The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6747P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X (base: 4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X scores 108,377 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 6.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,220 vs 2,000, a 46.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,244 vs 45,000 (42.4% advantage for the Xeon 6747P). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 48 / 96+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+38% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+48% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 288 MB (total)+125% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 108,377+7% | 101,685 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 76,136 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,220+61% | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,244 | 45,000+54% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1 TB — 199.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 92 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1 TB | 4096 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 92+5% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9970X targets HEDT / Workstation, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9970X rivals Xeon w7-3465X; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | HEDT / Workstation | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Xeon 6747P debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($2499 vs $6497), the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is $3998 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X delivers 43.4 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X the 93.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499-62% | $6497 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.4+176% | 15.7 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












