
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6960P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $7,126 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 219.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.4 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 500W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,244 vs 60,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 432 MB).
Xeon 6960P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+105.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+237.5% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅4.3% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 92) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9970X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 43.4 PassMark/$ ($9,625 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 350W.
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
2025Xeon 6960P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $7,126 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 219.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.4 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 500W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+105.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+237.5% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅4.3% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 92) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,244 vs 60,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 432 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9970X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 43.4 PassMark/$ ($9,625 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 350W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9970X better than Xeon 6960P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 818 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 697 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 542 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 674 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 891 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 874 FPS |
| high | 649 FPS | 826 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 734 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 1002 FPS | 891 FPS |
| high | 879 FPS | 768 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 658 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 764 FPS |
| medium | 768 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 674 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 587 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 504 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 9970X and Xeon 6960P


Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 108,377 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Xeon 6960P
Xeon 6960P
The Xeon 6960P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2024-09-24. It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 432 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA7529. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 130,659 points. Launch price was $9,625.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6960P offers 72 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6960P has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6960P — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X (base: 4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6960P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X scores 108,377 against the Xeon 6960P's 130,659 — a 18.6% lead for the Xeon 6960P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,220 vs 2,100, a 42.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,244 vs 60,000 (68.9% advantage for the Xeon 6960P). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X vs 432 MB (total) on the Xeon 6960P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 72 / 144+125% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+38% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+48% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 432 MB (total)+238% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 108,377 | 130,659+21% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 76,136 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,220+53% | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,244 | 60,000+105% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6960P uses LGA7529 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6960P supports up to 3072 GB of RAM compared to 1 TB — 199.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) vs 12 (Xeon 6960P). PCIe lanes: 92 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) vs 96 (Xeon 6960P) — the Xeon 6960P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) and Intel 600 Series (Xeon 6960P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA7529 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1 TB | 3072 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 12+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 92 | 96+4% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6960P). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9970X targets HEDT / Workstation, Xeon 6960P targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9970X rivals Xeon w7-3465X; Xeon 6960P rivals EPYC 9654.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | HEDT / Workstation | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Xeon 6960P debuted at $9625. On MSRP ($2499 vs $9625), the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is $7126 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X delivers 43.4 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6960P — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X the 104.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499-74% | $9625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.4+219% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












