PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,168 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 631.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 330W, a 205W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6747P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 101,685).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6747P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅+170% higher PassMark.
✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌164% higher power demand at 330W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,168 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 631.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 330W, a 205W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6747P needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+170% higher PassMark.
✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 101,685).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6747P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌164% higher power demand at 330W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6747P better than Core i5-13600K?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6747P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6747P is the better fit. You are getting 170% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1100% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6747P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13600K makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon 6747P is 1874.8% more expensive on MSRP at $6,497 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you 170% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i5-13600K is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 32.3% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13600K is also 631.3% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 15.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6747P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), 1100% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 24 MB), more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 14/20, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Xeon 6747P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	281 FPS	188 FPS
medium	264 FPS	165 FPS
high	220 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	155 FPS
medium	198 FPS	131 FPS
high	158 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	70 FPS
medium	133 FPS	63 FPS
high	102 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon 6747P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	632 FPS	520 FPS
medium	533 FPS	460 FPS
high	450 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	425 FPS
medium	474 FPS	383 FPS
high	403 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	262 FPS
medium	282 FPS	239 FPS
high	269 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	176 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon 6747P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	663 FPS	849 FPS
medium	543 FPS	768 FPS
high	477 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	737 FPS
medium	499 FPS	662 FPS
high	434 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	493 FPS
medium	381 FPS	402 FPS
high	344 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	303 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon 6747P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	941 FPS	1034 FPS
medium	941 FPS	916 FPS
high	923 FPS	789 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	670 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	848 FPS
medium	850 FPS	727 FPS
high	738 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	525 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	613 FPS
medium	588 FPS	538 FPS
high	529 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	403 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon 6747P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Xeon 6747P

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Xeon 6747P

The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6747P has 34 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 91.9% lead for the Xeon 6747P. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6747P
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	48 / 96+243%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+31%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+30%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB	288 MB (total)+1100%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	37,655	101,685+170%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	45,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600K) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the Xeon 6747P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6747P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6747P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon 6747P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon 6747P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon 6747P debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($329 vs $6497), the Core i5-13600K is $6168 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Core i5-13600K the 151.9% better value option.