EPYC 9554 vs Xeon 6747P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9554

64 Cores128 Thrd360 WWMax: 3.75 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon 6747P

48 Cores96 Thrd330 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9554

64 / 128

104,336

+2.6%

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Xeon 6747P

48 / 96

101,685

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9554

2022

Why buy it

✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6747P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.5 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($9,087 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,590 less on MSRP ($6,497 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).
✅Delivers 36.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 11.5 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).
✅Draws 330W instead of 360W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (101,685 vs 104,336).

EPYC 9554

2022

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,590 less on MSRP ($6,497 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).
✅Delivers 36.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 11.5 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).
✅Draws 330W instead of 360W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6747P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.5 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($9,087 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (101,685 vs 104,336).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6747P better than EPYC 9554?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon 6747P is ahead with a 16.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9554 pulls ahead with 2.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9554 is the better fit. You are getting 2.6% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6747P is the smarter buy today. Xeon 6747P is $2,590 cheaper on MSRP at $6,497 MSRP versus $9,087 MSRP, and it gives you a 16.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9554 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.6% better PassMark. It is also 36.3% better value on MSRP (15.7 vs 11.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6747P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9554 Benchmark Check

Xeon 6747P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9554	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	171 FPS	188 FPS
medium	142 FPS	165 FPS
high	122 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	155 FPS
medium	120 FPS	131 FPS
high	97 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	70 FPS
medium	60 FPS	63 FPS
high	47 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 9554 Open Xeon 6747P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9554	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	533 FPS	520 FPS
medium	465 FPS	460 FPS
high	373 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	303 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	438 FPS	425 FPS
medium	392 FPS	383 FPS
high	323 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	270 FPS	262 FPS
medium	246 FPS	239 FPS
high	216 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	176 FPS

Open EPYC 9554 Open Xeon 6747P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9554	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	673 FPS	849 FPS
medium	562 FPS	768 FPS
high	523 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	455 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	511 FPS	737 FPS
medium	426 FPS	662 FPS
high	390 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	377 FPS	493 FPS
medium	295 FPS	402 FPS
high	263 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	303 FPS

Open EPYC 9554 Open Xeon 6747P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9554	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	905 FPS	1034 FPS
medium	823 FPS	916 FPS
high	709 FPS	789 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	670 FPS
1440p
low	726 FPS	848 FPS
medium	633 FPS	727 FPS
high	541 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	463 FPS	525 FPS
4K
low	521 FPS	613 FPS
medium	465 FPS	538 FPS
high	408 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	403 FPS

Open EPYC 9554 Open Xeon 6747P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9554 and Xeon 6747P

EPYC 9554

The EPYC 9554 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.75 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 104,336 points. Launch price was $9,087.

Xeon 6747P

The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9554 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9554 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.75 GHz on the EPYC 9554 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Xeon 6747P (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9554 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9554 scores 104,336 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 9554. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9554 vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.

Feature	EPYC 9554	Xeon 6747P
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+33%	48 / 96
Boost Clock	3.75 GHz	3.9 GHz+4%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+15%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	104,336+3%	101,685
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	45,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9554 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9554) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9554) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the EPYC 9554 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9554) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).

Feature	EPYC 9554	Xeon 6747P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9554) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). Primary use case: EPYC 9554 targets Data Center, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9554 rivals Xeon 8468; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	EPYC 9554	Xeon 6747P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Data Center	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9554 launched at $9087 MSRP, while the Xeon 6747P debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($9087 vs $6497), the Xeon 6747P is $2590 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9554 delivers 11.5 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Xeon 6747P the 30.7% better value option.