
EPYC 9455P
Popular choices:

EPYC 9554
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9455P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,268 less on MSRP ($4,819 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 111.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 11.5 PassMark/$ ($4,819 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 360W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 9554
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9455P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (104,336 vs 116,926).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.5 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($9,087 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 360W vs 300W.
EPYC 9455P
2024EPYC 9554
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,268 less on MSRP ($4,819 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 111.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 11.5 PassMark/$ ($4,819 MSRP vs $9,087 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 360W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9455P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (104,336 vs 116,926).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.5 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($9,087 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 360W vs 300W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9455P better than EPYC 9554?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9554 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9554 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 655 FPS | 533 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9554 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9554 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 993 FPS | 905 FPS |
| medium | 892 FPS | 823 FPS |
| high | 767 FPS | 709 FPS |
| ultra | 692 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 726 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 525 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 351 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9455P and EPYC 9554

EPYC 9455P
EPYC 9455P
The EPYC 9455P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 116,926 points. Launch price was $4,819.

EPYC 9554
EPYC 9554
The EPYC 9554 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.75 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 104,336 points. Launch price was $9,087.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9455P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9554 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9554 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9455P versus 3.75 GHz on the EPYC 9554 — a 16% clock advantage for the EPYC 9455P (base: 3.15 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 9455P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9554 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9455P scores 116,926 against the EPYC 9554's 104,336 — a 11.4% lead for the EPYC 9455P. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9554 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 64 / 128+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+17% | 3.75 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.15 GHz+2% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 116,926+12% | 104,336 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9455P supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9455P) and SP5 (EPYC 9554).
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9554 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 9 TB+50% | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9455P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9554 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9455P rivals Xeon 6766E; EPYC 9554 rivals Xeon 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9554 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Data Center |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9455P launched at $4819 MSRP, while the EPYC 9554 debuted at $9087. On MSRP ($4819 vs $9087), the EPYC 9455P is $4268 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9455P delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 11.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9554 — making the EPYC 9455P the 71.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9455P | EPYC 9554 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4819-47% | $9087 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.3+111% | 11.5 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













