EPYC 9454P vs Xeon 6740P

AMD

EPYC 9454P

48 Cores96 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon 6740P

48 Cores96 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9454P

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $52 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
  • 45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon 6740P

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 270W instead of 290W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9454P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (90,684 vs 94,686).
  • 1.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,650 MSRPvs$4,598 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9454P better than Xeon 6740P?
Yes. EPYC 9454P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data and 4.4% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9454P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.6% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9454P is the better fit. You are getting 4.4% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9454P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9454P is $52 cheaper on MSRP at $4,598 MSRP versus $4,650 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 5.6% better value on MSRP (20.6 vs 19.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6740P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 9454PXeon 6740P
1080p
low171 FPS187 FPS
medium142 FPS165 FPS
high122 FPS131 FPS
ultra96 FPS106 FPS
1440p
low149 FPS155 FPS
medium120 FPS131 FPS
high97 FPS100 FPS
ultra77 FPS82 FPS
4K
low70 FPS70 FPS
medium60 FPS63 FPS
high47 FPS49 FPS
ultra39 FPS40 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 9454PXeon 6740P
1080p
low533 FPS285 FPS
medium465 FPS252 FPS
high373 FPS208 FPS
ultra303 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low438 FPS233 FPS
medium392 FPS210 FPS
high323 FPS178 FPS
ultra255 FPS142 FPS
4K
low270 FPS144 FPS
medium246 FPS133 FPS
high216 FPS120 FPS
ultra179 FPS100 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 9454PXeon 6740P
1080p
low672 FPS849 FPS
medium561 FPS768 FPS
high522 FPS730 FPS
ultra455 FPS641 FPS
1440p
low511 FPS737 FPS
medium426 FPS662 FPS
high390 FPS626 FPS
ultra337 FPS558 FPS
4K
low377 FPS493 FPS
medium294 FPS402 FPS
high263 FPS364 FPS
ultra211 FPS303 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 9454PXeon 6740P
1080p
low902 FPS1097 FPS
medium822 FPS978 FPS
high708 FPS834 FPS
ultra625 FPS702 FPS
1440p
low724 FPS902 FPS
medium631 FPS777 FPS
high540 FPS660 FPS
ultra462 FPS551 FPS
4K
low519 FPS656 FPS
medium464 FPS577 FPS
high407 FPS505 FPS
ultra350 FPS425 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9454P and Xeon 6740P

AMD

EPYC 9454P

The EPYC 9454P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 94,686 points. Launch price was $4,598.

Intel

Xeon 6740P

The Xeon 6740P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 90,684 points. Launch price was $4,650.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9454P and Xeon 6740P share an identical 48-core/96-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454P versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6740P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 9454P uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6740P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454P scores 94,686 against the Xeon 6740P's 90,684 — a 4.3% lead for the EPYC 9454P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454P vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740P.

FeatureEPYC 9454PXeon 6740P
Cores / Threads
48 / 96
48 / 96
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.75 GHz+31%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
288 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm
Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark
94,686+4%
90,684
Geekbench 6 Single
1,923
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,576
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9454P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6740P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9454P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454P) vs 8 (Xeon 6740P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454P) vs 88 (Xeon 6740P) — the EPYC 9454P offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureEPYC 9454PXeon 6740P
Socket
SP5
LGA4710
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB+50%
4 TB
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+45%
88
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454P) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6740P). Primary use case: EPYC 9454P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Xeon 6740P targets High-density Compute. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454P rivals Xeon 8468; Xeon 6740P rivals EPYC 9355P.

FeatureEPYC 9454PXeon 6740P
Integrated GPU
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use
Data Center / Single Socket
High-density Compute
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9454P launched at $4598 MSRP, while the Xeon 6740P debuted at $4650. On MSRP ($4598 vs $4650), the EPYC 9454P is $52 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454P delivers 20.6 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740P — making the EPYC 9454P the 5.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9454PXeon 6740P
MSRP
$4598-1%
$4650
Performance per Dollar
20.6+6%
19.5
Release Date
2022
2025