EPYC 9454P vs Xeon w9-3595X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9454P

48 Cores96 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon w9-3595X

60 Cores120 Thrd385 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9454P

48 / 96

94,686

0.0%

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon w9-3595X

60 / 120

97,534

+3.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9454P

2022

Why buy it

✅+8.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).
✅Costs $1,291 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Draws 290W instead of 385W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w9-3595X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +43.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,118 vs 18,576).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
❌32.8% higher power demand at 385W vs 290W.

EPYC 9454P

2022

Xeon w9-3595X

2024

Why buy it

✅+8.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).
✅Costs $1,291 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
✅Draws 290W instead of 385W, a 95W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +43.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,118 vs 18,576).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
❌32.8% higher power demand at 385W vs 290W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9454P better than Xeon w9-3595X?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon w9-3595X is ahead with a 43.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9454P pulls ahead with 8.5% better Geekbench multi-core. EPYC 9454P also has the bigger cache pool with 127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9454P is the better fit. You are getting 8.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9454P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9454P is $1,291 cheaper on MSRP at $4,598 MSRP versus $5,889 MSRP, and it gives you 8.5% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Xeon w9-3595X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 43.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 24.3% better value on MSRP (20.6 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3595X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9454P Benchmark Check

Xeon w9-3595X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9454P	Xeon w9-3595X
1080p
low	171 FPS	316 FPS
medium	142 FPS	306 FPS
high	122 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	207 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	274 FPS
medium	120 FPS	237 FPS
high	97 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	186 FPS
medium	60 FPS	159 FPS
high	47 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	108 FPS

Open EPYC 9454P Open Xeon w9-3595X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9454P	Xeon w9-3595X
1080p
low	533 FPS	384 FPS
medium	465 FPS	332 FPS
high	373 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	303 FPS	236 FPS
1440p
low	438 FPS	308 FPS
medium	392 FPS	273 FPS
high	323 FPS	232 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	270 FPS	181 FPS
medium	246 FPS	162 FPS
high	216 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	133 FPS

Open EPYC 9454P Open Xeon w9-3595X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9454P	Xeon w9-3595X
1080p
low	672 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	561 FPS	1086 FPS
high	522 FPS	1020 FPS
ultra	455 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	511 FPS	1009 FPS
medium	426 FPS	913 FPS
high	390 FPS	840 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	377 FPS	605 FPS
medium	294 FPS	521 FPS
high	263 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	400 FPS

Open EPYC 9454P Open Xeon w9-3595X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9454P	Xeon w9-3595X
1080p
low	902 FPS	1145 FPS
medium	822 FPS	1015 FPS
high	708 FPS	901 FPS
ultra	625 FPS	802 FPS
1440p
low	724 FPS	928 FPS
medium	631 FPS	813 FPS
high	540 FPS	716 FPS
ultra	462 FPS	629 FPS
4K
low	519 FPS	678 FPS
medium	464 FPS	606 FPS
high	407 FPS	543 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9454P Open Xeon w9-3595X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9454P and Xeon w9-3595X

EPYC 9454P

The EPYC 9454P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 94,686 points. Launch price was $4,598.

Xeon w9-3595X

The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9454P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9454P uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454P scores 94,686 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 3% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,923 vs 2,300, a 17.9% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,576 vs 17,118 (8.2% advantage for the EPYC 9454P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454P vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.

Feature	EPYC 9454P	Xeon w9-3595X
Cores / Threads	48 / 96	60 / 120+25%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4.8 GHz+26%
Base Clock	2.75 GHz+38%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+128%	112.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	94,686	97,534+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	130,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,923	2,300+20%
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,576+9%	17,118

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9454P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454P) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3595X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454P) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the EPYC 9454P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454P) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).

Feature	EPYC 9454P	Xeon w9-3595X
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454P) vs true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: EPYC 9454P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454P rivals Xeon 8468; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.

Feature	EPYC 9454P	Xeon w9-3595X
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9454P launched at $4598 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3595X debuted at $5889. On MSRP ($4598 vs $5889), the EPYC 9454P is $1291 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454P delivers 20.6 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the EPYC 9454P the 21.7% better value option.