PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 265K

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.0% higher average FPS across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,341 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
✅Delivers 875.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 190.3 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 64EU, while Xeon 6740P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (58,789 vs 90,684).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6740P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6740P

2025

Why buy it

✅+54.3% higher PassMark.
✅+860% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 265K across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 190.3 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 265K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 7 265K

2024

Xeon 6740P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.0% higher average FPS across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,341 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
✅Delivers 875.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 190.3 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 64EU, while Xeon 6740P needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+54.3% higher PassMark.
✅+860% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (58,789 vs 90,684).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6740P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 265K across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 190.3 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 265K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 265K better than Xeon 6740P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6740P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 7 265K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6740P is the better fit. You are getting 54.3% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 860% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 265K is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 7 265K is $4,341 cheaper on MSRP at $309 MSRP versus $4,650 MSRP, and it gives you a 30.0% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon 6740P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 54.3% better PassMark. It is also 875.6% better value on MSRP (190.3 vs 19.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6740P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), 860% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 30 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 20/20. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Ultra 7 265K Benchmark Check

Xeon 6740P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core Ultra 7 265K	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	305 FPS	187 FPS
medium	290 FPS	165 FPS
high	244 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	205 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	155 FPS
medium	201 FPS	131 FPS
high	163 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	158 FPS	70 FPS
medium	132 FPS	63 FPS
high	102 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 265K Open Xeon 6740P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core Ultra 7 265K	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	778 FPS	285 FPS
medium	656 FPS	252 FPS
high	548 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	491 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	673 FPS	233 FPS
medium	595 FPS	210 FPS
high	499 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	422 FPS	142 FPS
4K
low	395 FPS	144 FPS
medium	357 FPS	133 FPS
high	335 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	292 FPS	100 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 265K Open Xeon 6740P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core Ultra 7 265K	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	851 FPS	849 FPS
medium	694 FPS	768 FPS
high	617 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	528 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	731 FPS	737 FPS
medium	599 FPS	662 FPS
high	521 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	517 FPS	493 FPS
medium	436 FPS	402 FPS
high	396 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	303 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 265K Open Xeon 6740P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core Ultra 7 265K	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	1128 FPS	1097 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	978 FPS
high	889 FPS	834 FPS
ultra	808 FPS	702 FPS
1440p
low	892 FPS	902 FPS
medium	789 FPS	777 FPS
high	687 FPS	660 FPS
ultra	611 FPS	551 FPS
4K
low	604 FPS	656 FPS
medium	542 FPS	577 FPS
high	489 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	432 FPS	425 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 265K Open Xeon 6740P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265K and Xeon 6740P

Core Ultra 7 265K

The Core Ultra 7 265K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,789 points. Launch price was $394.

Xeon 6740P

The Xeon 6740P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 90,684 points. Launch price was $4,650.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 265K packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon 6740P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740P has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265K versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6740P — a 36.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265K uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon 6740P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265K scores 58,789 against the Xeon 6740P's 90,684 — a 42.7% lead for the Xeon 6740P. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265K vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740P.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 265K	Xeon 6740P
Cores / Threads	20 / 20	48 / 96+140%
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+45%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz+86%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+860%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)+50%	2 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm	Intel 3 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	58,789	90,684+54%
Cinebench R23 Multi	36,309	—
Geekbench 6 Single	3,283	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	22,293	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265K uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6740P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 7 265K supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265K) vs 8 (Xeon 6740P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 7 265K) vs 88 (Xeon 6740P) — the Xeon 6740P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 265K	Xeon 6740P
Socket	LGA1851	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	4 TB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265K) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6740P). The Core Ultra 7 265K includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 64EU), while the Xeon 6740P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6740P targets High-density Compute. Direct competitor: Xeon 6740P rivals EPYC 9355P.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 265K	Xeon 6740P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Arc Graphics 64EU	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	—	High-density Compute

💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 7 265K launched at $309 MSRP, while the Xeon 6740P debuted at $4650. On MSRP ($309 vs $4650), the Core Ultra 7 265K is $4341 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265K delivers 190.3 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740P — making the Core Ultra 7 265K the 162.8% better value option.