PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

✅+47.7% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 98 MB).
✅Draws 270W instead of 300W, a 30W reduction.
✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
11.2% HIGHER MSRP
$4,995 MSRPvs$4,491 MSRP

Xeon Platinum 8461V

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $504 less on MSRP ($4,491 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (74,982 vs 79,634).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 144 MB).

Xeon 6737P

2025

Xeon Platinum 8461V

2023

Why buy it

✅+47.7% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 98 MB).
✅Draws 270W instead of 300W, a 30W reduction.
✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $504 less on MSRP ($4,491 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌
11.2% HIGHER MSRP
$4,995 MSRPvs$4,491 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (74,982 vs 79,634).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 144 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6737P better than Xeon Platinum 8461V?

Yes. Xeon 6737P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6737P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6737P is the better fit. You are getting 6.2% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 47.7% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 98 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6737P is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8461V makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon 6737P is 11.2% more expensive on MSRP at $4,995 MSRP versus $4,491 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Platinum 8461V is also 4.7% better value on MSRP (16.7 vs 15.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6737P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 47.7% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 98 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 48/96. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon 6737P Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8461V Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon 6737P	Xeon Platinum 8461V
1080p
low	190 FPS	191 FPS
medium	166 FPS	172 FPS
high	132 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	114 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	156 FPS
medium	132 FPS	132 FPS
high	101 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	71 FPS
medium	63 FPS	64 FPS
high	49 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	40 FPS

Open Xeon 6737P Open Xeon Platinum 8461V

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon 6737P	Xeon Platinum 8461V
1080p
low	520 FPS	282 FPS
medium	460 FPS	250 FPS
high	376 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	230 FPS
medium	383 FPS	208 FPS
high	321 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	256 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	262 FPS	143 FPS
medium	239 FPS	131 FPS
high	212 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	99 FPS

Open Xeon 6737P Open Xeon Platinum 8461V

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon 6737P	Xeon Platinum 8461V
1080p
low	883 FPS	814 FPS
medium	813 FPS	737 FPS
high	768 FPS	703 FPS
ultra	677 FPS	624 FPS
1440p
low	756 FPS	723 FPS
medium	692 FPS	651 FPS
high	650 FPS	608 FPS
ultra	581 FPS	547 FPS
4K
low	510 FPS	486 FPS
medium	429 FPS	397 FPS
high	383 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	294 FPS

Open Xeon 6737P Open Xeon Platinum 8461V

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon 6737P	Xeon Platinum 8461V
1080p
low	985 FPS	1027 FPS
medium	886 FPS	909 FPS
high	766 FPS	782 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	657 FPS
1440p
low	806 FPS	843 FPS
medium	701 FPS	721 FPS
high	604 FPS	618 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	515 FPS
4K
low	582 FPS	609 FPS
medium	521 FPS	533 FPS
high	462 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	397 FPS	395 FPS

Open Xeon 6737P Open Xeon Platinum 8461V

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6737P and Xeon Platinum 8461V

Xeon 6737P

The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.

Xeon Platinum 8461V

The Xeon Platinum 8461V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 74,982 points. Launch price was $4,491.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6737P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8461V has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon 6737P (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon 6737P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6737P scores 79,634 against the Xeon Platinum 8461V's 74,982 — a 6% lead for the Xeon 6737P. L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8461V.

Feature	Xeon 6737P	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+8%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+32%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	144 MB (total)+48%	97.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-57%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	79,634+6%	74,982
Geekbench 6 Single	2,000	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	45,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6737P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P versus 4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — the Xeon Platinum 8461V supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6737P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8461V) — the Xeon 6737P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6737P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8461V).

Feature	Xeon 6737P	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	4800+95900%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+104857500%	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+10%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005; Xeon Platinum 8461V rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	Xeon 6737P	Xeon Platinum 8461V
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High Performance Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon 6737P launched at $4995 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V debuted at $4491. On MSRP ($4995 vs $4491), the Xeon Platinum 8461V is $504 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6737P delivers 15.9 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8461V — making the Xeon Platinum 8461V the 4.6% better value option.