
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Popular choices:

Xeon 6737P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.9% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,346 less on MSRP ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.1 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (23,294 vs 45,000).
- ❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.
Xeon 6737P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+93.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023Xeon 6737P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.9% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,346 less on MSRP ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.1 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+93.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (23,294 vs 45,000).
- ❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6737P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 816 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 695 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 469 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 593 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 476 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 883 FPS |
| medium | 724 FPS | 813 FPS |
| high | 650 FPS | 768 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 677 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 716 FPS | 756 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 692 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 429 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 318 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 1002 FPS | 886 FPS |
| high | 879 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 873 FPS | 806 FPS |
| medium | 769 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 397 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and Xeon 6737P


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 82,268 points. Launch price was $2,649.

Xeon 6737P
Xeon 6737P
The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6737P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 28% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX scores 82,268 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 3.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,686 vs 2,000, a 29.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 23,294 vs 45,000 (63.6% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+32% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+45% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 144 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm | Intel 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 82,268+3% | 79,634 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,686+34% | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 23,294 | 45,000+93% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Xeon 6737P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX launched at $2649 MSRP, while the Xeon 6737P debuted at $4995. On MSRP ($2649 vs $4995), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is $2346 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX the 64.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2649-47% | $4995 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.1+96% | 15.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












