
Xeon 6730P
Popular choices:

Xeon 6740E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6730P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,539 less on MSRP ($3,726 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (74,113 vs 76,167).
Xeon 6740E
2024Why buy it
- ✅+2.8% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6730P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 288 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
Xeon 6730P
2025Xeon 6740E
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,539 less on MSRP ($3,726 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+2.8% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (74,113 vs 76,167).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6730P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 288 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6730P better than Xeon 6740E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6730P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6730P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 520 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 321 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 135 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6730P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 849 FPS | 934 FPS |
| medium | 768 FPS | 831 FPS |
| high | 730 FPS | 779 FPS |
| ultra | 641 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 737 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 558 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6730P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 980 FPS | 918 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 830 FPS |
| high | 763 FPS | 715 FPS |
| ultra | 659 FPS | 610 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 801 FPS | 710 FPS |
| medium | 698 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 514 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 575 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 344 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6730P and Xeon 6740E

Xeon 6730P
Xeon 6730P
The Xeon 6730P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 74,113 points. Launch price was $3,726.

Xeon 6740E
Xeon 6740E
The Xeon 6740E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 76,167 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6730P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6740E offers 96 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740E has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6730P versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6740E — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Xeon 6730P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon 6730P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon 6740E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6730P scores 74,113 against the Xeon 6740E's 76,167 — a 2.7% lead for the Xeon 6740E. L3 cache: 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6730P vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740E.
| Feature | Xeon 6730P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 96 / 96+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+19% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 288 MB (total)+200% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+100% |
| Process | Intel 3 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 74,113 | 76,167+3% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4710 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 6400 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 80 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6730P) and C741 (Xeon 6740E).
| Feature | Xeon 6730P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400 | 6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, TDX virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon 6730P rivals EPYC 9354; Xeon 6740E rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | Xeon 6730P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, TDX | VT-x, VT-d, TDX |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6730P launched at $3726 MSRP, while the Xeon 6740E debuted at $5265. On MSRP ($3726 vs $5265), the Xeon 6730P is $1539 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6730P delivers 19.9 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740E — making the Xeon 6730P the 31.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6730P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3726-29% | $5265 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.9+37% | 14.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













