
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Popular choices:

Xeon 6730P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,231 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6730P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon 6730P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 280W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (74,113 vs 74,985).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.9 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Xeon 6730P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,231 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 280W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6730P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (74,113 vs 74,985).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.9 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX better than Xeon 6730P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 777 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 660 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 447 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 631 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 661 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 604 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 528 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1212 FPS | 980 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 924 FPS | 763 FPS |
| ultra | 818 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 949 FPS | 801 FPS |
| medium | 826 FPS | 698 FPS |
| high | 713 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 609 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 575 FPS |
| medium | 604 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 527 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 395 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon 6730P


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.

Xeon 6730P
Xeon 6730P
The Xeon 6730P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 74,113 points. Launch price was $3,726.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon 6730P share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6730P — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon 6730P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX scores 74,985 against the Xeon 6730P's 74,113 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6730P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+18% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB | 288 MB (total)+125% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 74,985+1% | 74,113 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 53,977 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,686 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,745 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6730P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX versus 6400 on the Xeon 6730P — the Xeon 6730P supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6730P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) vs 80 (Xeon 6730P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) and C741 (Xeon 6730P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 6400+159900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+52428700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6730P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6730P). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon 6730P rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, TDX |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX launched at $2495 MSRP, while the Xeon 6730P debuted at $3726. On MSRP ($2495 vs $3726), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is $1231 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6730P — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX the 40.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6730P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2495-33% | $3726 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1+51% | 19.9 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












