
Xeon 6521P
Popular choices:

Xeon w9-3475X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6521P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+74.5% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 83 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,489 less on MSRP ($1,250 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 197.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.8 vs 17.4 PassMark/$ ($1,250 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅21.4% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3475X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (64,761 vs 65,077).
Xeon w9-3475X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (83 MB vs 144 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.4 vs 51.8 PassMark/$ ($3,739 MSRP vs $1,250 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
Xeon 6521P
2025Xeon w9-3475X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+74.5% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 83 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,489 less on MSRP ($1,250 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 197.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.8 vs 17.4 PassMark/$ ($1,250 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅21.4% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3475X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (64,761 vs 65,077).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (83 MB vs 144 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.4 vs 51.8 PassMark/$ ($3,739 MSRP vs $1,250 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w9-3475X better than Xeon 6521P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6521P | Xeon w9-3475X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 108 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6521P | Xeon w9-3475X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 585 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 133 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6521P | Xeon w9-3475X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 900 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 829 FPS | 1086 FPS |
| high | 768 FPS | 1020 FPS |
| ultra | 677 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 770 FPS | 1009 FPS |
| medium | 706 FPS | 913 FPS |
| high | 650 FPS | 839 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 400 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6521P | Xeon w9-3475X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 983 FPS | 1304 FPS |
| medium | 884 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 764 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| ultra | 663 FPS | 866 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 803 FPS | 1061 FPS |
| medium | 699 FPS | 918 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 800 FPS |
| ultra | 517 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 784 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 685 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6521P and Xeon w9-3475X

Xeon 6521P
Xeon 6521P
The Xeon 6521P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,761 points. Launch price was $1,250.

Xeon w9-3475X
Xeon w9-3475X
The Xeon w9-3475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,077 points. Launch price was $3,739.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6521P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w9-3475X offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon w9-3475X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6521P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3475X — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3475X (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon 6521P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6521P scores 64,761 against the Xeon w9-3475X's 65,077 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon w9-3475X. L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6521P vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3475X.
| Feature | Xeon 6521P | Xeon w9-3475X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 36 / 72+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+18% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 144 MB (total)+75% | 82.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 64,761 | 65,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,814 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 44,869 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6521P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Xeon 6521P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3475X — the Xeon 6521P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 136 (Xeon 6521P) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3475X) — the Xeon 6521P offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6521P) and W790 (Xeon w9-3475X).
| Feature | Xeon 6521P | Xeon w9-3475X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+127900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 136+21% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w9-3475X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6521P) vs true (Xeon w9-3475X). Direct competitor: Xeon 6521P rivals EPYC 9354; Xeon w9-3475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Xeon 6521P | Xeon w9-3475X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6521P launched at $1250 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3475X debuted at $3739. On MSRP ($1250 vs $3739), the Xeon 6521P is $2489 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6521P delivers 51.8 pts/$ vs 17.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3475X — making the Xeon 6521P the 99.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6521P | Xeon w9-3475X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1250-67% | $3739 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.8+198% | 17.4 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













