
Xeon 6520P
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8454H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6520P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 144 MB vs 83 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅Costs $5,245 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 418.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 210W instead of 270W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Platinum 8454H
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (83 MB vs 144 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,347 vs 64,010).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($6,540 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 270W vs 210W.
Xeon 6520P
2025Xeon Platinum 8454H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 144 MB vs 83 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅Costs $5,245 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 418.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 210W instead of 270W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (83 MB vs 144 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,347 vs 64,010).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($6,540 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 270W vs 210W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6520P better than Xeon Platinum 8454H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 520 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 321 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 910 FPS | 811 FPS |
| medium | 838 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 791 FPS | 700 FPS |
| ultra | 698 FPS | 624 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 782 FPS | 724 FPS |
| medium | 716 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 528 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 294 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 985 FPS | 1084 FPS |
| medium | 887 FPS | 965 FPS |
| high | 767 FPS | 823 FPS |
| ultra | 666 FPS | 679 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 804 FPS | 891 FPS |
| medium | 700 FPS | 765 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 462 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 415 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6520P and Xeon Platinum 8454H

Xeon 6520P
Xeon 6520P
The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.

Xeon Platinum 8454H
Xeon Platinum 8454H
The Xeon Platinum 8454H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 62,347 points. Launch price was $6,540.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6520P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8454H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 6520P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon 6520P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6520P scores 64,010 against the Xeon Platinum 8454H's 62,347 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon 6520P. L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8454H.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+18% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+14% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 144 MB (total)+75% | 82.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 64,010+3% | 62,347 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6520P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P versus 4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — the Xeon Platinum 8454H supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8454H supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6520P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8454H) — the Xeon 6520P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8454H).
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+10% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254; Xeon Platinum 8454H rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6520P launched at $1295 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H debuted at $6540. On MSRP ($1295 vs $6540), the Xeon 6520P is $5245 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6520P delivers 49.4 pts/$ vs 9.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8454H — making the Xeon 6520P the 135.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1295-80% | $6540 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.4+420% | 9.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













