
Xeon 6517P
Popular choices:

Xeon w7-3445
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6517P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+37.1% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 53 MB).
- ✅Costs $794 less on MSRP ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 270W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3445 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (48,810 vs 48,991).
Xeon w7-3445
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅27.3% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 72 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($1,989 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
- ❌42.1% higher power demand at 270W vs 190W.
Xeon 6517P
2025Xeon w7-3445
2023Why buy it
- ✅+37.1% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 53 MB).
- ✅Costs $794 less on MSRP ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 270W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅27.3% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3445 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (48,810 vs 48,991).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 72 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($1,989 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
- ❌42.1% higher power demand at 270W vs 190W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w7-3445 better than Xeon 6517P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6517P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 106 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6517P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 547 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6517P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 986 FPS | 1045 FPS |
| high | 910 FPS | 967 FPS |
| ultra | 824 FPS | 829 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 994 FPS |
| medium | 755 FPS | 880 FPS |
| high | 697 FPS | 798 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 395 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6517P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1022 FPS | 1225 FPS |
| medium | 916 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 782 FPS | 981 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 851 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 788 FPS | 1044 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 903 FPS |
| high | 586 FPS | 779 FPS |
| ultra | 504 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 676 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6517P and Xeon w7-3445

Xeon 6517P
Xeon 6517P
The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.

Xeon w7-3445
Xeon w7-3445
The Xeon w7-3445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,991 points. Launch price was $1,989.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6517P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-3445 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon w7-3445 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3445 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3445 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon 6517P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6517P scores 48,810 against the Xeon w7-3445's 48,991 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon w7-3445. L3 cache: 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3445.
| Feature | Xeon 6517P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 20 / 40+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+23% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 72 MB (total)+37% | 52.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 48,810 | 48,991 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6517P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Xeon 6517P versus 4800 on the Xeon w7-3445 — the Xeon 6517P supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6517P) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3445) — the Xeon w7-3445 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P) and W790 (Xeon w7-3445).
| Feature | Xeon 6517P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+33% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 112+27% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-3445 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554; Xeon w7-3445 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Xeon 6517P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6517P launched at $1195 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3445 debuted at $1989. On MSRP ($1195 vs $1989), the Xeon 6517P is $794 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6517P delivers 40.8 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3445 — making the Xeon 6517P the 49.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6517P | Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1195-40% | $1989 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.8+66% | 24.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













