
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

TITAN V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅15.3% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 563.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
TITAN V
2017Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌501% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020TITAN V
2017Why buy it
- ✅15.3% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 563.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌501% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than TITAN V?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN V still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 903 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and TITAN V

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

TITAN V
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the TITAN V's 20,077 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 10.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the TITAN V uses Volta, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5,120 (TITAN V). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+10% | 20,077 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+15% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+36% | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+19% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 320+74% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 7.5 MB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4.5 MB+13% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 640+248% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The TITAN V relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V has 12 GB. The TITAN V offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 653 GB/s (TITAN V) — a 45.8% advantage for the TITAN V. Bus width: 256-bit vs 3072-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4.5 MB (TITAN V) — the TITAN V has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 653 GB/s+46% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 3072-bit+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4.5 MB+13% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (TITAN V). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the TITAN V's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 600W (TITAN V). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-12% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+26% | 80.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the TITAN V launched at $2999. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 83.4% less ($2500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6.7 (TITAN V) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 562.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-83% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+563% | 6.7 |
| Codename | GA104 | GV100 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | December 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #63 | #109 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












