G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 806.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

✅30.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅82.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 184).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌
831.7% HIGHER MSRP
$4,649 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 806.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅30.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅82.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 184).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌
831.7% HIGHER MSRP
$4,649 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX A6000 better than GeForce RTX 3070?

Yes. Quadro RTX A6000 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 30.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2.8% higher PassMark G3D performance, 336 vs 184 Tensor cores, and 48 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX A6000 is about 831.7% more expensive on MSRP at $4,649 MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and you are getting 30.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.8% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3070 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Quadro RTX A6000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3070 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 3070 make more sense than Quadro RTX A6000?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3070 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (220W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $499 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX A6000. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX A6000 currently gives you 2.8% higher G3D Mark and 30.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3070 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3070 Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX A6000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX A6000
1080p
low	158 FPS	270 FPS
medium	140 FPS	250 FPS
high	123 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	257 FPS
medium	109 FPS	214 FPS
high	96 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	175 FPS
medium	67 FPS	144 FPS
high	52 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	93 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX A6000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX A6000
1080p
low	470 FPS	661 FPS
medium	405 FPS	555 FPS
high	327 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	361 FPS
1440p
low	294 FPS	489 FPS
medium	246 FPS	417 FPS
high	213 FPS	331 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	261 FPS
4K
low	141 FPS	255 FPS
medium	120 FPS	220 FPS
high	105 FPS	188 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	158 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX A6000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX A6000
1080p
low	885 FPS	929 FPS
medium	712 FPS	759 FPS
high	619 FPS	675 FPS
ultra	499 FPS	513 FPS
1440p
low	692 FPS	716 FPS
medium	557 FPS	586 FPS
high	473 FPS	509 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	493 FPS
medium	388 FPS	408 FPS
high	330 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	249 FPS	256 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX A6000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX A6000
1080p
low	600 FPS	855 FPS
medium	527 FPS	784 FPS
high	433 FPS	684 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	513 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	679 FPS
medium	433 FPS	616 FPS
high	339 FPS	513 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	292 FPS	489 FPS
medium	270 FPS	410 FPS
high	238 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	256 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3070 Open Quadro RTX A6000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro RTX A6000

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro RTX A6000

The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 and the Quadro RTX A6000 reaches 22,798 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 184 Tensor cores vs 336.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX A6000
G3D Mark Score	22,172	22,798+3%
Architecture	Ampere	Ampere
Process Node	8 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	5888	10752+83%
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.31 TFLOPS	38.71 TFLOPS+91%
Boost Clock	1725 MHz	1800 MHz+4%
ROPs	96	112+17%
TMUs	184	336+83%
L1 Cache	5.8 MB	10.5 MB+81%
L2 Cache	4 MB	6 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores	46	84+83%
Tensor Cores	184	336+83%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The Quadro RTX A6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX A6000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX A6000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	48 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	768 GB/s+71%
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB	6 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX A6000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX A6000
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3070	Quadro RTX A6000
TDP	220W-27%	300W
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin	8-pin EPS
Length	242mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85
Perf/Watt	100.8+33%	76.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 89.3% less ($4150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 806.1% better value.