
L40S
Popular choices:

TITAN V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
L40S
2022Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌150.1% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$2,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
TITAN V
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,501 less on MSRP ($2,999 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
L40S
2022TITAN V
2017Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,501 less on MSRP ($2,999 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌150.1% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$2,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is TITAN V better than L40S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does L40S make more sense than TITAN V?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 784 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 629 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 901 FPS | 875 FPS |
| medium | 721 FPS | 715 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40S and TITAN V

L40S
L40S
The L40S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,023 points.

TITAN V
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
The L40S scores 20,023 and the TITAN V reaches 20,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L40S is built on Ada Lovelace while the TITAN V uses Volta, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40S) vs 5,120 (TITAN V). Raw compute: 91.61 TFLOPS (L40S) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,023 | 20,077 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Volta |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+255% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 91.61 TFLOPS+515% | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+73% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+100% | 96 |
| TMUs | 568+78% | 320 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+137% | 7.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+967% | 4.5 MB |
| Tensor Cores | 568 | 640+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40S comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V has 12 GB. The L40S offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40S) vs 653 GB/s (TITAN V) — a 47% advantage for the L40S. Bus width: 384-bit vs 3072-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (L40S) vs 4.5 MB (TITAN V) — the L40S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+300% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+47% | 653 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 3072-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+967% | 4.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40S) vs 12.1 (TITAN V). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40S) vs NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L40S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V).
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40S draws 300W versus the TITAN V's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The TITAN V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 800W (L40S) vs 600W (TITAN V). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 800W | 600W-25% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7 | 80.3+20% |
Value Analysis
The L40S launched at $7500 MSRP, while the TITAN V launched at $2999. The TITAN V costs 60% less ($4501 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (L40S) vs 6.7 (TITAN V) — the TITAN V offers 148.1% better value. The L40S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7500 | $2999-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 6.7+148% |
| Codename | AD102 | GV100 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | December 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #76 | #109 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












