L40S vs Radeon PRO W6800

L40S

2022Core: 1110 MHzBoost: 2520 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W6800

2021Core: 2075 MHzBoost: 2320 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

L40S

2022

Why buy it

  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 233.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $7,500 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
  • 20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

Radeon PRO W6800

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,251 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 237.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
  • Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W6800 better than L40S?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 20,023 vs 20,270 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon PRO W6800 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (250W vs 300W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
L40S is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021, more VRAM at 48 GB instead of 32 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon PRO W6800 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $2,249 MSRP. Radeon PRO W6800 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon PRO W6800 is about $5,251 cheaper on MSRP at $2,249 MSRP versus $7,500 MSRP, and you are getting 1.2% higher G3D Mark. L40S is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does L40S make more sense than Radeon PRO W6800?
Yes. L40S is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $7,500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W6800. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W6800 currently gives you 1.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 237.6%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetL40SRadeon PRO W6800
1080p
low287 FPS222 FPS
medium256 FPS204 FPS
high216 FPS179 FPS
ultra136 FPS163 FPS
1440p
low256 FPS200 FPS
medium214 FPS167 FPS
high158 FPS138 FPS
ultra98 FPS129 FPS
4K
low117 FPS135 FPS
medium98 FPS114 FPS
high68 FPS90 FPS
ultra59 FPS83 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetL40SRadeon PRO W6800
1080p
low784 FPS549 FPS
medium629 FPS468 FPS
high478 FPS364 FPS
ultra416 FPS309 FPS
1440p
low646 FPS372 FPS
medium528 FPS308 FPS
high411 FPS246 FPS
ultra332 FPS202 FPS
4K
low338 FPS156 FPS
medium273 FPS134 FPS
high240 FPS112 FPS
ultra201 FPS90 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetL40SRadeon PRO W6800
1080p
low901 FPS912 FPS
medium721 FPS730 FPS
high601 FPS608 FPS
ultra451 FPS456 FPS
1440p
low676 FPS684 FPS
medium541 FPS547 FPS
high451 FPS456 FPS
ultra338 FPS342 FPS
4K
low451 FPS456 FPS
medium360 FPS365 FPS
high300 FPS304 FPS
ultra225 FPS228 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetL40SRadeon PRO W6800
1080p
low483 FPS687 FPS
medium422 FPS558 FPS
high376 FPS500 FPS
ultra288 FPS449 FPS
1440p
low345 FPS574 FPS
medium312 FPS472 FPS
high274 FPS418 FPS
ultra209 FPS342 FPS
4K
low224 FPS367 FPS
medium193 FPS316 FPS
high153 FPS292 FPS
ultra117 FPS228 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of L40S and Radeon PRO W6800

NVIDIA

L40S

The L40S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,023 points.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6800

The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.

Graphics Performance

The L40S scores 20,023 and the Radeon PRO W6800 reaches 20,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L40S is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40S) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 91.61 TFLOPS (L40S) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40S) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 568 Tensor cores.

FeatureL40SRadeon PRO W6800
G3D Mark Score
20,023
20,270+1%
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
5 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
18176+373%
3840
Compute (TFLOPS)
91.61 TFLOPS+414%
17.82 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2520 MHz+9%
2320 MHz
ROPs
192+100%
96
TMUs
568+137%
240
L1 Cache
17.8 MB+2273%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB+1100%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
142+137%
60

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureL40SRadeon PRO W6800
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The L40S comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The L40S offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40S) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 66.7% advantage for the L40S. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (L40S) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the L40S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureL40SRadeon PRO W6800
VRAM Capacity
48 GB+50%
32 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
960 GB/s+67%
576 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+50%
256-bit
L2 Cache
48 MB+1100%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (L40S) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureL40SRadeon PRO W6800
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40S) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L40S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).

FeatureL40SRadeon PRO W6800
Encoder
NVENC 8th Gen
VCN 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC 5th Gen
VCN 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The L40S draws 300W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 800W (L40S) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureL40SRadeon PRO W6800
TDP
300W
250W-17%
Recommended PSU
800W
650W-19%
Power Connector
16-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
66.7
81.1+22%
💰

Value Analysis

The L40S launched at $7500 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249. The Radeon PRO W6800 costs 70% less ($5251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (L40S) vs 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) — the Radeon PRO W6800 offers 233.3% better value. The L40S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).

FeatureL40SRadeon PRO W6800
MSRP
$7500
$2249-70%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
9.0+233%
Codename
AD102
Navi 21
Release
October 13 2022
June 8 2021
Ranking
#76
#74