
L40S
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
L40S
2022Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌233.5% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,251 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 237.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
L40S
2022Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,251 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 237.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌233.5% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6800 better than L40S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does L40S make more sense than Radeon PRO W6800?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | L40S | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | L40S | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 784 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 629 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | L40S | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 901 FPS | 912 FPS |
| medium | 721 FPS | 730 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 456 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 228 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | L40S | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 228 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40S and Radeon PRO W6800

L40S
L40S
The L40S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,023 points.

Radeon PRO W6800
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
Graphics Performance
The L40S scores 20,023 and the Radeon PRO W6800 reaches 20,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L40S is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40S) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 91.61 TFLOPS (L40S) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40S) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 568 Tensor cores.
| Feature | L40S | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,023 | 20,270+1% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+373% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 91.61 TFLOPS+414% | 17.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+9% | 2320 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+100% | 96 |
| TMUs | 568+137% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+2273% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+137% | 60 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | L40S | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40S comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The L40S offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40S) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 66.7% advantage for the L40S. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (L40S) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the L40S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40S | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+50% | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+67% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40S) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | L40S | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40S) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L40S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).
| Feature | L40S | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40S draws 300W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 800W (L40S) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | L40S | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 800W | 650W-19% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7 | 81.1+22% |
Value Analysis
The L40S launched at $7500 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249. The Radeon PRO W6800 costs 70% less ($5251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (L40S) vs 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) — the Radeon PRO W6800 offers 233.3% better value. The L40S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | L40S | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7500 | $2249-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 9.0+233% |
| Codename | AD102 | Navi 21 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #76 | #74 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












