
Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅0.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌300.1% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,500 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 303.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅0.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,500 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 303.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌300.1% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 8000 better than TITAN RTX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN RTX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 897 FPS | 904 FPS |
| medium | 717 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 8000 and TITAN RTX

Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 576 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927 | 20,095 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288 | 288 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72 | 72 |
| Tensor Cores | 576 | 576 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 14.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+100% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+14% | 672 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 7.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 8000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W-7% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6+7% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999 MSRP, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. The TITAN RTX costs 75% less ($7500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX offers 300% better value.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $2499-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 8.0+300% |
| Codename | TU102 | TU102 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #78 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












