G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 8000

2018

Why buy it

✅153.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
2765% HIGHER MSRP
$9,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 57.4 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
❌246.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 75W.

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $9,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2779% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 57.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
✅More future proof: RDNA 4 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 75W instead of 260W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro RTX 8000

2018

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

2025

Why buy it

✅153.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $9,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2779% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 57.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
✅More future proof: RDNA 4 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 75W instead of 260W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
2765% HIGHER MSRP
$9,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 57.4 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
❌246.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB better than Quadro RTX 8000?

Yes. Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro RTX 8000 averages 153.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 20,024 vs 19,927 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is a 2025 card with FSR Upscaling + Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1, while Quadro RTX 8000 is a 2018 model from an older high-end class with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2018, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is about $9,650 cheaper on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $9,999 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 2779%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro RTX 8000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro RTX 8000 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $9,999 MSRP, even if Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 8000 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 8000	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
1080p
low	205 FPS	160 FPS
medium	190 FPS	140 FPS
high	166 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	151 FPS	82 FPS
1440p
low	187 FPS	143 FPS
medium	158 FPS	120 FPS
high	130 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	61 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	65 FPS
medium	100 FPS	57 FPS
high	77 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	35 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 8000 Open Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 8000	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
1080p
low	499 FPS	133 FPS
medium	442 FPS	100 FPS
high	343 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	289 FPS	48 FPS
1440p
low	325 FPS	91 FPS
medium	274 FPS	59 FPS
high	223 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	153 FPS	47 FPS
medium	135 FPS	33 FPS
high	113 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	19 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 8000 Open Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 8000	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
1080p
low	897 FPS	630 FPS
medium	717 FPS	497 FPS
high	598 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	448 FPS	364 FPS
1440p
low	673 FPS	404 FPS
medium	538 FPS	338 FPS
high	448 FPS	282 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	229 FPS
4K
low	448 FPS	269 FPS
medium	359 FPS	221 FPS
high	299 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	224 FPS	117 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 8000 Open Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 8000	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
1080p
low	673 FPS	235 FPS
medium	605 FPS	197 FPS
high	515 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	448 FPS	130 FPS
1440p
low	544 FPS	180 FPS
medium	487 FPS	153 FPS
high	418 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	96 FPS
4K
low	355 FPS	97 FPS
medium	323 FPS	77 FPS
high	297 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	224 FPS	49 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 8000 Open Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 8000 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

Quadro RTX 8000

The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the RDNA 4 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2530 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,024 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB reaches 20,024 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB uses RDNA 4, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2530 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
G3D Mark Score	19,927	20,024
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 4
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	4608+125%	2048
Boost Clock	1770 MHz	2530 MHz+43%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 8000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 8000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 8000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB) — a 140% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
VRAM Capacity	48 GB+200%	16 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	768 GB/s+140%	320 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB).

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	VCN 5.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP10	VCN 5.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB's 75W — a 110.4% difference. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 550W (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
TDP	260W	75W-71%
Recommended PSU	650W	550W-15%
Power Connector	1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	267mm	240mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	76.6	267.0+249%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB launched at $349. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB costs 96.5% less ($9650 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 57.4 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB) — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB offers 2770% better value. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).