
L40S
Popular choices:

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
L40S
2022Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌200.1% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,001 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 201.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
L40S
2022TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,001 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 201.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌200.1% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is TITAN RTX better than L40S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does L40S make more sense than TITAN RTX?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | L40S | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | L40S | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 784 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 629 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | L40S | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 901 FPS | 904 FPS |
| medium | 721 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | L40S | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40S and TITAN RTX

L40S
L40S
The L40S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,023 points.

TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The L40S scores 20,023 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L40S is built on Ada Lovelace while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40S) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 91.61 TFLOPS (L40S) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40S) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 568 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,023 | 20,095 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+294% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 91.61 TFLOPS+462% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+42% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+100% | 96 |
| TMUs | 568+97% | 288 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+296% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+97% | 72 |
| Tensor Cores | 568 | 576+1% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The TITAN RTX gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L40S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40S comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The L40S offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40S) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 42.9% advantage for the L40S. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (L40S) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the L40S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+100% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+43% | 672 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40S) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40S) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L40S) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | L40S | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40S draws 300W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 6.9% difference. The TITAN RTX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 800W (L40S) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 280W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 800W | 650W-19% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7 | 71.8+8% |
Value Analysis
The L40S launched at $7500 MSRP, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. The TITAN RTX costs 66.7% less ($5001 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (L40S) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX offers 196.3% better value. The L40S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | L40S | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7500 | $2499-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 8.0+196% |
| Codename | AD102 | TU102 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #76 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












