
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Popular choices:

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 280W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅23.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 144).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌143.5% higher power demand at 280W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
2023TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 280W, a 165W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅23.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 144).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌143.5% higher power demand at 280W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile better than TITAN RTX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN RTX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 811 FPS | 904 FPS |
| medium | 661 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 587 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and TITAN RTX

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,702 points.

TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile scores 20,702 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 15.62 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 144 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,702+3% | 20,095 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.62 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 1770 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 288+100% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 72+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | 576+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN RTX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The TITAN RTX supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 162.5% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 672 GB/s+163% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile draws 115W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 83.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-59% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 180.0+151% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2499 |
| Codename | AD106 | TU102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #83 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












