
Tesla M40
Popular choices:

Tesla T4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$1,880 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌58.9% longer card at 267mm vs 168mm.
Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $620 less on MSRP ($1,880 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla M40: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla M40 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Tesla M40
2015Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $620 less on MSRP ($1,880 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla M40: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla M40 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$1,880 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌58.9% longer card at 267mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla M40 better than Tesla T4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Tesla T4 make more sense than Tesla M40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Tesla M40 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Tesla M40 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Tesla M40 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Tesla M40 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M40 and Tesla T4

Tesla M40
Tesla M40
The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.

Tesla T4
Tesla T4
The Tesla T4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 585 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M40 scores 10,220 and the Tesla T4 reaches 10,153 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M40 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla T4 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Tesla M40) vs 2,560 (Tesla T4). Raw compute: 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40) vs 8.141 TFLOPS (Tesla T4). Boost clocks: 1112 MHz vs 1590 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,220 | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.832 TFLOPS | 8.141 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1112 MHz | 1590 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 2.5 MB+127% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Tesla M40) vs 4 MB (Tesla T4) — the Tesla T4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Tesla M40) vs 12 Ultimate (Tesla T4). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40) vs NVENC (Turing) (Tesla T4). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Tesla T4).
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 (2x) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M40 draws 250W versus the Tesla T4's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The Tesla T4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Tesla M40) vs 500W (Tesla T4). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 76°C.
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 76°C-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 40.9 | 145.0+255% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M40 launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Tesla T4 launched at $1880. The Tesla T4 costs 24.8% less ($620 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (Tesla M40) vs 5.4 (Tesla T4) — the Tesla T4 offers 31.7% better value. The Tesla T4 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $1880-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1 | 5.4+32% |
| Codename | GM200 | TU104 |
| Release | November 10 2015 | September 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #256 | #260 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












