
Tesla M40
Popular choices:

Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla M40
2015Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla M40 24GB better than Tesla M40?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Tesla M40 make more sense than Tesla M40 24GB?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Tesla M40 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Tesla M40 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Tesla M40 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Tesla M40 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M40 and Tesla M40 24GB

Tesla M40
Tesla M40
The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.

Tesla M40 24GB
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M40 scores 10,220 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M40 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Tesla M40) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1112 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,220 | 10,641+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.832 TFLOPS | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1112 MHz | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Tesla M40) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 (2x) | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M40 draws 250W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 0% difference. The Tesla M40 24GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Tesla M40) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 40.9 | 42.6+4% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M40 launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. The Tesla M40 24GB costs 20% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (Tesla M40) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB offers 29.3% better value.
| Feature | Tesla M40 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $2000-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1 | 5.3+29% |
| Codename | GM200 | GM200 |
| Release | November 10 2015 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #256 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












