
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
Popular choices:

Tesla T4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
2019Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla T4 better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) make more sense than Tesla T4?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) and Tesla T4

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,128 points. Launch price was $229.

Tesla T4
Tesla T4
The Tesla T4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 585 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) scores 10,128 and the Tesla T4 reaches 10,153 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is built on Turing while the Tesla T4 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 2,560 (Tesla T4). Raw compute: 4.884 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 8.141 TFLOPS (Tesla T4). Boost clocks: 1590 MHz vs 1590 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,128 | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2560+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.884 TFLOPS | 8.141 TFLOPS+67% |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2.5 MB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla T4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 4 MB (Tesla T4) — the Tesla T4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (Tesla T4). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs NVENC (Turing) (Tesla T4). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Tesla T4).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) draws 80W versus the Tesla T4's 70W — a 13.3% difference. The Tesla T4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 500W (Tesla T4). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 76°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 70W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 76°C-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.6 | 145.0+15% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1880 |
| Codename | TU116 | TU104 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | September 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #250 | #260 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











