
Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:

Tesla P4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $821 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 448.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.
Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 180mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌458.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5500
2019Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $821 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 448.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 180mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌458.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P4 better than Radeon RX 5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5500 make more sense than Tesla P4?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 101 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5500 and Tesla P4

Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.

Tesla P4
Tesla P4
The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5500 scores 8,837 and the Tesla P4 reaches 9,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5500 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Tesla P4 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500) vs 2,560 (Tesla P4). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500) vs 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4). Boost clocks: 1845 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,837 | 9,004+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2560+82% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS | 5.704 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1845 MHz+66% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 160+82% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla P4 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500) vs 12.1 (Tesla P4). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500) vs NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5500 draws 110W versus the Tesla P4's 75W — a 37.8% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 5500) vs 500W (Tesla P4). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 180mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 75W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 180mm | 168mm |
| Height | 110mm | 53mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 80.3 | 120.1+50% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179 MSRP, while the Tesla P4 launched at $1000. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 82.1% less ($821 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) vs 9.0 (Tesla P4) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 448.9% better value. The Radeon RX 5500 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-82% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.4+449% | 9.0 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GP104 |
| Release | October 7 2019 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #297 | #293 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













