
RadeonT 780M
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.
RadeonT 780M
2024Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is RadeonT 780M better than Tesla M60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 780M and Tesla M60

RadeonT 780M
RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT 780M scores 7,098 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (RadeonT 780M) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,098+1% | 7,002 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048 ×2+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.909 TFLOPS+85% | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+146% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128 ×2+167% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RadeonT 780M) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT 780M draws 15W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 181% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 780M) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 473.2+1931% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3000 |
| Codename | Phoenix | GM204 |
| Release | January 31 2024 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #359 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












