Quadro M5000M vs Tesla M60

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro M5000M

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).

Tesla M60

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.

Quadro M5000M

2015

Tesla M60

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro M5000M better than Tesla M60?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 7,056 vs 7,002 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro M5000M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (100W vs 300W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro M5000M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro M5000M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro M5000M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $3,000 MSRP, and you are getting 0.8% higher G3D Mark. Tesla M60 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Tesla M60 is 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 7,002 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M5000M Benchmark Check

Tesla M60 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro M5000M	Tesla M60
1080p
low	105 FPS	104 FPS
medium	89 FPS	90 FPS
high	73 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	89 FPS	91 FPS
medium	75 FPS	80 FPS
high	55 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	29 FPS
medium	32 FPS	27 FPS
high	20 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	17 FPS	16 FPS

Open Quadro M5000M Open Tesla M60

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro M5000M	Tesla M60
1080p
low	203 FPS	173 FPS
medium	174 FPS	136 FPS
high	128 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	84 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	125 FPS
medium	125 FPS	96 FPS
high	100 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	85 FPS	68 FPS
medium	71 FPS	52 FPS
high	59 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	32 FPS

Open Quadro M5000M Open Tesla M60

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro M5000M	Tesla M60
1080p
low	318 FPS	315 FPS
medium	254 FPS	252 FPS
high	212 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	236 FPS
medium	191 FPS	189 FPS
high	159 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	158 FPS
medium	127 FPS	126 FPS
high	106 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	79 FPS

Open Quadro M5000M Open Tesla M60

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro M5000M	Tesla M60
1080p
low	219 FPS	182 FPS
medium	186 FPS	148 FPS
high	152 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	127 FPS	103 FPS
1440p
low	172 FPS	132 FPS
medium	149 FPS	110 FPS
high	117 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	97 FPS	77 FPS
medium	76 FPS	60 FPS
high	60 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	36 FPS

Open Quadro M5000M Open Tesla M60

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5000M and Tesla M60

Quadro M5000M

The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.

Tesla M60

The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M5000M scores 7,056 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1051 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M5000M	Tesla M60
G3D Mark Score	7,056	7,002
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1,536	2048 ×2+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.995 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS ×2+61%
Boost Clock	1051 MHz	1178 MHz+12%
ROPs	64	64 ×2
TMUs	96	128 ×2+33%
L1 Cache	576 KB	768 KB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M5000M	Tesla M60
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M5000M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M60 has 4 GB. The Quadro M5000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Quadro M5000M	Tesla M60
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro M5000M	Tesla M60
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).

Feature	Quadro M5000M	Tesla M60
Encoder	NVENC 5.0	NVENC 2.0 (2x)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	PureVideo HD VP6 (2x)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M5000M draws 100W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 100% difference. The Quadro M5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5000M) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.