
GRID P40-24Q
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-24Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌90% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$3,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,699 less on MSRP ($3,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 88.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
GRID P40-24Q
2015Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,699 less on MSRP ($3,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 88.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌90% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$3,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID P40-24Q better than Tesla M60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-24Q and Tesla M60

GRID P40-24Q
GRID P40-24Q
The GRID P40-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,057 points.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-24Q scores 7,057 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-24Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-24Q) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,057 | 7,002 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-24Q) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-24Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-24Q draws 225W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 28.6% difference. The GRID P40-24Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-24Q) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-25% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4+35% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-24Q launched at $5699 MSRP, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. The Tesla M60 costs 47.4% less ($2699 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the Tesla M60 offers 91.7% better value.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $3000-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 2.3+92% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM204 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #433 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












