GRID P40-24Q vs Tesla M60

GRID P40-24Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M60

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID P40-24Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 90% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,699 MSRPvs$3,000 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).

Tesla M60

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,699 less on MSRP ($3,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 88.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is GRID P40-24Q better than Tesla M60?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 7,057 vs 7,002 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GRID P40-24Q is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (225W vs 300W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P40-24Q is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GRID P40-24Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GRID P40-24Q is about 90.0% more expensive on MSRP at $5,699 MSRP versus $3,000 MSRP, and you are getting 0.8% higher G3D Mark. Tesla M60 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Tesla M60 is 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 7,002 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGRID P40-24QTesla M60
1080p
low104 FPS104 FPS
medium90 FPS90 FPS
high73 FPS73 FPS
ultra44 FPS44 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS91 FPS
medium80 FPS80 FPS
high58 FPS58 FPS
ultra33 FPS33 FPS
4K
low29 FPS29 FPS
medium27 FPS27 FPS
high18 FPS18 FPS
ultra16 FPS16 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGRID P40-24QTesla M60
1080p
low162 FPS173 FPS
medium128 FPS136 FPS
high94 FPS105 FPS
ultra75 FPS84 FPS
1440p
low119 FPS125 FPS
medium92 FPS96 FPS
high74 FPS81 FPS
ultra57 FPS62 FPS
4K
low68 FPS68 FPS
medium52 FPS52 FPS
high43 FPS43 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGRID P40-24QTesla M60
1080p
low318 FPS315 FPS
medium254 FPS252 FPS
high212 FPS210 FPS
ultra159 FPS158 FPS
1440p
low238 FPS236 FPS
medium191 FPS189 FPS
high159 FPS158 FPS
ultra119 FPS118 FPS
4K
low159 FPS158 FPS
medium127 FPS126 FPS
high106 FPS105 FPS
ultra79 FPS79 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGRID P40-24QTesla M60
1080p
low182 FPS182 FPS
medium148 FPS148 FPS
high133 FPS133 FPS
ultra103 FPS103 FPS
1440p
low132 FPS132 FPS
medium110 FPS110 FPS
high99 FPS99 FPS
ultra77 FPS77 FPS
4K
low77 FPS77 FPS
medium60 FPS60 FPS
high49 FPS49 FPS
ultra36 FPS36 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-24Q and Tesla M60

NVIDIA

GRID P40-24Q

The GRID P40-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,057 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla M60

The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-24Q scores 7,057 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-24Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-24Q) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGRID P40-24QTesla M60
G3D Mark Score
7,057
7,002
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1178 MHz
ROPs
64
64 ×2
TMUs
128
128 ×2
L1 Cache
768 KB
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P40-24QTesla M60
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGRID P40-24QTesla M60
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureGRID P40-24QTesla M60
DirectX
12.0
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
0
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-24Q) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-24Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).

FeatureGRID P40-24QTesla M60
Encoder
NVENC 4.0
NVENC 2.0 (2x)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP7
PureVideo HD VP6 (2x)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-24Q draws 225W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 28.6% difference. The GRID P40-24Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-24Q) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGRID P40-24QTesla M60
TDP
225W-25%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Perf/Watt
31.4+35%
23.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P40-24Q launched at $5699 MSRP, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. The Tesla M60 costs 47.4% less ($2699 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the Tesla M60 offers 91.7% better value.

FeatureGRID P40-24QTesla M60
MSRP
$5699
$3000-47%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
2.3+92%
Codename
GM204
GM204
Release
August 30 2015
August 30 2015
Ranking
#433
#355