
Radeon Pro SSG
Popular choices:

Tesla M40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro SSG
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌180% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$2,500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,499 less on MSRP ($2,500 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro SSG
2016Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,499 less on MSRP ($2,500 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌180% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$2,500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro SSG better than Tesla M40?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M40 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 395 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 115 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro SSG and Tesla M40

Radeon Pro SSG
Radeon Pro SSG
The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Tesla M40
Tesla M40
The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro SSG scores 10,972 versus the Tesla M40's 10,220 — the Radeon Pro SSG leads by 7.4%. The Radeon Pro SSG is built on GCN 3.0 while the Tesla M40 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,972+7% | 10,220 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+33% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+26% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1112 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+33% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.1 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40) — the Radeon Pro SSG has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 12.0 (Tesla M40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40).
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro SSG draws 260W versus the Tesla M40's 250W — a 3.9% difference. The Tesla M40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 500W (Tesla M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 250W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 42.2+3% | 40.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro SSG launched at $6999 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 launched at $2500. The Tesla M40 costs 64.3% less ($4499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 4.1 (Tesla M40) — the Tesla M40 offers 156.2% better value. The Radeon Pro SSG is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6999 | $2500-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | 4.1+156% |
| Codename | Fiji | GM200 |
| Release | July 26 2016 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #249 | #256 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












