G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

Why buy it

✅5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌642.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 35W.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 260W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024

Why buy it

✅5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 260W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌642.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile better than Radeon Pro SSG?

Yes. RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro SSG averages 5.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,162 vs 10,972 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a 2024 card with DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, while Radeon Pro SSG is a 2016 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016, better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the smarter buy by a wide margin. RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $6,999 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro SSG really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro SSG still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro SSG is 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM, 10,972 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro SSG Benchmark Check

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro SSG	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	121 FPS	135 FPS
medium	103 FPS	120 FPS
high	85 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	98 FPS	121 FPS
medium	81 FPS	100 FPS
high	61 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	43 FPS	68 FPS
medium	37 FPS	60 FPS
high	26 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	37 FPS

Open Radeon Pro SSG Open RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro SSG	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	235 FPS	201 FPS
medium	204 FPS	171 FPS
high	154 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	102 FPS
1440p
low	166 FPS	140 FPS
medium	139 FPS	114 FPS
high	113 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	95 FPS	81 FPS
medium	79 FPS	67 FPS
high	66 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	41 FPS

Open Radeon Pro SSG Open RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro SSG	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	494 FPS	502 FPS
medium	395 FPS	402 FPS
high	329 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	247 FPS	251 FPS
1440p
low	370 FPS	377 FPS
medium	296 FPS	301 FPS
high	247 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	185 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	247 FPS	251 FPS
medium	197 FPS	201 FPS
high	165 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	126 FPS

Open Radeon Pro SSG Open RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro SSG	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	243 FPS	453 FPS
medium	211 FPS	386 FPS
high	171 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	251 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	377 FPS
medium	164 FPS	301 FPS
high	129 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	105 FPS	217 FPS
medium	88 FPS	170 FPS
high	70 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	126 FPS

Open Radeon Pro SSG Open RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro SSG and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Radeon Pro SSG

The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro SSG scores 10,972 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 11,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro SSG is built on GCN 3.0 while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2025 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro SSG	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	10,972	11,162+2%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4096+100%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.602 TFLOPS+4%	8.294 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1050 MHz	2025 MHz+93%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	256+300%	64
L1 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB	12 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro SSG lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro SSG relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon Pro SSG	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro SSG	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	12 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro SSG	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.1	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	Radeon Pro SSG	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	VCE 4.0	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	UVD 7.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro SSG draws 260W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 152.5% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro SSG	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	260W	35W-87%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	42.2	318.9+656%